Fear of disease progression and dyadic self-care among stroke patients and their spouses are dyadic phenomena that can predict each other, with bidirectional predictions confirmed between patients' fear of disease progression and their self-care, and between spouses' fear of disease progression and their contribution to self-care.
Key Findings
Results
Patients' self-care behavior and spousal contribution to self-care showed a positive association in contemporaneous networks at the dimensional level.
369 stroke patient-spouse dyads completed two rounds of surveys between August 2024 and May 2025
Contemporaneous network analysis was used to examine interactions between fear of disease progression and dyadic self-care variables
The positive association was identified at the dimensional level in the contemporaneous network
Instruments used included the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory and the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care Chronic Illness Inventory
Results
Patients' fear of disease progression and spouses' fear of disease progression showed a positive association with each other in contemporaneous networks at the dimensional level.
The association was identified in contemporaneous network analysis
Fear of disease progression was measured using the Fear of Progression Questionnaire Short Form for patients and the Fear of Progression Questionnaire Short Form/Partner for spouses
The mutual fear of disease progression between patients and spouses was confirmed as a dyadic phenomenon
Data were collected from 369 stroke patient-spouse dyads
Results
Spouses' fear of disease progression was negatively correlated with their contribution to self-care at the dimensional level in contemporaneous networks.
This negative association was identified in the contemporaneous network analysis
The finding suggests that higher spousal fear of disease progression is associated with lower caregiver contribution to self-care
The Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care Chronic Illness Inventory was used to measure spousal contribution
The sample consisted of 369 stroke patient-spouse dyads
Results
Cross-lagged network analysis confirmed bidirectional predictions between patients' fear of disease progression and their self-care over time.
Bidirectional temporal prediction was established using cross-lagged panel network analysis
Two rounds of surveys were completed by 369 stroke patient-spouse dyads
The longitudinal design allowed for temporal directionality to be assessed between fear of disease progression and self-care in patients
The General Demographic Questionnaire, Fear of Progression Questionnaire Short Form, and Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory were used
Results
Cross-lagged network analysis confirmed bidirectional predictions between spouses' fear of disease progression and their contribution to self-care over time.
Bidirectional temporal relationships were confirmed between spousal fear and caregiver contribution to self-care
The cross-lagged network method was used to capture temporal dynamics across two survey waves
Data were collected from 369 patient-spouse dyads over a longitudinal period from August 2024 to May 2025
Instruments included the Fear of Progression Questionnaire Short Form/Partner and the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care Chronic Illness Inventory
Results
Patients' fear of disease progression and self-care dimensions predicted corresponding dimensions in spouses over time.
Cross-lagged network analysis revealed inter-dyadic temporal predictions from patient variables to spouse variables
Specific dimensions of patients' fear of disease progression predicted corresponding dimensions in spouses
Specific dimensions of patients' self-care predicted corresponding dimensions in spouses' contribution to self-care
This finding supports the characterization of stroke rehabilitation as a 'dynamic dyadic synergy'
Xu L, Lin T, Su S, Wang Z, Li Y, Li P. (2026). A Contemporaneous and Longitudinal Network Analysis of Fear of Disease Progression and Dyadic Self-Care in Stroke Patients and Their Spouses.. Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.70166