What This Means
This research tested whether an online support programme called Carers-ID could be delivered to family members who care for people with intellectual disabilities. The programme was developed during the COVID-19 pandemic, when many carers were facing especially high levels of stress. The study randomly assigned 99 eligible carers to either receive the two-week online programme (51 people) or to a waitlist control group (48 people), and measured outcomes including wellbeing, resilience, social connectedness, depression, anxiety, and stress at baseline, two weeks later, and at three months.
The main goal of the study was to test whether running a larger trial would be practical—looking at how many people could be recruited and how many stayed involved throughout. Results showed that while 85% of eligible carers completed the initial assessment, retention dropped significantly over time, with only 55% completing the post-intervention assessment and 41% remaining at the three-month follow-up. Among the outcomes measured, only resilience showed a statistically significant improvement in the intervention group compared to the control group at two weeks (mean difference of 12.20, p=0.04). No significant differences were found for wellbeing, social connectedness, depression, stress, or anxiety.
This research suggests that delivering the Carers-ID programme to family carers of people with intellectual disabilities is feasible, but that keeping carers engaged in research studies is a major challenge, likely because of the time pressures and demands of caregiving. The authors suggest that future, larger studies testing whether the programme is truly effective should find ways to make participation more flexible and accessible for this often-overlooked group of people.