A scoping review of 232 articles identified 143 unique emotion and non-cognitive decision-making measures used in aging research, finding a predominant preference for assessing risk-taking and impulsivity across both clinical and non-clinical samples.
Key Findings
Results
The scoping review identified 232 articles and 143 unique emotion and non-cognitive decision-making measures used in aging samples between 2018 and 2023.
Systematic search conducted across six databases: Embase (Elsevier), MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (EbscoHost), Cochrane Library, Web of Science (Clarivate), and Scopus (Elsevier)
Studies published between January 2018 and November 2023 were included
Two-stage sample selection process: independent screening of titles and abstracts, followed by full-text review and data extraction
Final dataset included 232 articles containing 143 unique emotion and non-cognitive (ENC) decision-making measures
Results
The five most frequently used emotion and non-cognitive decision-making measures were the Iowa Gambling Task, Balloon Analogue Risk Task, Delay Discounting Task, Decisional Conflict Scale, and Cambridge Gambling Task.
These measures were identified from among 143 unique ENC decision-making measures found across the 232 articles
The measures span both behavioral task-based assessments and self-report scales
These top measures reflect a field-wide preference for particular established instruments over newer or less-validated tools
Results
The most common decision-making measures reflect a preference for assessing risk-taking and impulsivity in the sphere of non-cognitive and emotion function.
This trend was observed across the full sample of 232 articles
Similar trends were found in clinical samples of older adults with neurodegenerative diseases
Risk-taking and impulsivity domains dominated the measurement landscape for emotion and non-cognitive decision-making
Results
Studies using these measures were distributed across clinical, normative, and mixed sample types, with the largest proportion using both clinical and non-clinical samples.
28% of manuscripts used measures with a clinical sample
26% of manuscripts used measures with a normative adult sample
47% of manuscripts used measures with both clinical and non-clinical samples
Background
Decision-making is described as a complex cognitive function that declines with age and is highly susceptible to impairment from dementia due to Alzheimer's and related neurodegenerative diseases.
The ARMCADA (Advancing Reliable Measurement in Cognitive Aging and Decision-making Ability) research initiative was formed to understand how measures of emotion and non-cognitive influences of decision-making have been used in research and clinical settings
Emotions and other non-cognitive assets are also believed to influence decision-making ability
The review sought to inform development of reliable and validated measurement of decision-making among older adults
Dworak E, Pila S, Novack M, Hosseinian Z, Ho E, Ece B, et al.. (2026). A scoping review of emotion and non-cognitive measures of decision-making ability in older adults by the ARMCADA study.. Frontiers in public health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1718861