Exercise & Training

A Speed-Dependent Assessment of E-Textile-Based Sensor Technology: Validity of the Prevayl Wearable Heart Rate Monitor.

TL;DR

The Prevayl heart rate monitor demonstrated valid measurements when compared to ECG during incremental running, supported by strong correlations to ECG heart rate data at different speeds and with different analysis methods.

Key Findings

The Prevayl device demonstrated strong overall agreement with ECG for beat count across all participants.

  • Median beat count agreement of 100.5% with ECG (range: 98.6–104.4%)
  • Sample size: 26 healthy adults (15 female, mean age 32.0 ± 10.4 years)
  • Participants completed a 16-min incremental running test on a treadmill
  • Heart rate data were recorded simultaneously via 3-lead ECG and Prevayl wearable

Strong correlations were observed between ECG and Prevayl for both raw beat count and heart rate expressed in beats per minute.

  • Correlation for raw beat count: r = 0.94, p < 0.01
  • Correlation for heart rate (bpm) from ECG and Prevayl algorithm: r = 0.96, p < 0.01
  • Beat count error (%), mean heart rate absolute error (bpm), and percentage error (bpm) were calculated as outcome measures

Strong speed-dependent correlations between ECG and Prevayl were maintained across all running speeds tested (0–12 kph).

  • Correlation for raw beat count across running speeds: r = 0.82–0.89, p < 0.01
  • Correlation for bpm across running speeds: r = 0.86–0.93, p < 0.01
  • Running speeds ranged from 0 to 12 kph during the incremental protocol

Bland-Altman analysis revealed negligible systematic bias between the Prevayl device and ECG.

  • Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between ECG and Prevayl heart rate measurements
  • The analysis demonstrated 'negligible systematic bias' across the measurement range
  • Both Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used to assess agreement and correlation, respectively

The study validated the Prevayl e-textile-based wearable sensor as an accurate method for monitoring cardiovascular responses during incremental treadmill running.

  • The Prevayl system is described as an e-textile-based sensor technology
  • Validation was conducted against a 3-lead ECG as criterion standard
  • The device was assessed across multiple analytical approaches including beat count error, absolute error, percentage error, correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis
  • Authors concluded the findings support the Prevayl's use for 'monitoring cardiovascular responses during exercise'

What This Means

This research suggests that the Prevayl smart garment, which uses electronic textiles (e-textiles) woven into clothing to measure heart rate, can accurately track heart rate during running exercise. Researchers tested 26 healthy adults who wore the Prevayl device while running on a treadmill at progressively faster speeds up to 12 kilometers per hour, and simultaneously measured their heart rate with a standard 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), which is considered the gold standard for heart rate measurement. The Prevayl device counted almost exactly the same number of heartbeats as the ECG (a median of 100.5%), and the two measurements correlated very strongly regardless of running speed. This research suggests that e-textile-based wearables like the Prevayl can provide reliable heart rate data during aerobic exercise, even as movement intensity increases. The statistical analyses, including Bland-Altman plots showing negligible systematic bias and Pearson correlation coefficients consistently above r = 0.82, indicate the device does not systematically over- or undercount heartbeats compared to ECG. This matters because motion artifact — interference caused by body movement — is a known challenge for wearable heart rate monitors during exercise. This research suggests that consumers, athletes, and potentially health professionals could use e-textile garments like the Prevayl as a practical, non-invasive, and relatively affordable alternative to clinical ECG for monitoring heart rate during running. However, the study was conducted on healthy adults only, and further research would be needed to assess performance in clinical populations or at higher exercise intensities.

Check Your Own Numbers

Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.

Upload Your Labs

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Burgess L, Armstrong M, Beresford L, Callaway A. (2026). A Speed-Dependent Assessment of E-Textile-Based Sensor Technology: Validity of the Prevayl Wearable Heart Rate Monitor.. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113378