Exercise & Training

Academic-year differences and psychophysiological associations with objective spinal parameters in physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional DIERS formetric 4D study.

TL;DR

Objective spinal parameters did not differ significantly between third- and fourth-year physiotherapy students despite marked differences in school-based standing and sitting exposure, while trunk length was independently associated with trait anxiety and sleep quality after multivariable adjustment.

Key Findings

Fourth-year physiotherapy students had different school-based postural exposure than third-year students, with longer standing and shorter sitting durations.

  • Sample: 132 healthy physiotherapy students (70 third-year, 62 fourth-year).
  • Fourth-year students reported longer school-based standing and shorter sitting durations than third-year students (both p < 0.001).
  • Spinal parameters were measured with the DIERS Formetric 4D three-dimensional system.

Fourth-year students had lower trait anxiety and burnout scores and higher walking activity than third-year students.

  • Measures: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Maslach Burnout Inventory, and International Physical Activity Questionnaire.
  • The abstract reports these group differences without giving effect sizes or p-values.

No statistically significant between-group differences were found in trunk length, kyphotic angle, or lordotic angle between third- and fourth-year students.

  • Kyphotic angle was numerically lower in fourth-year students but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.051).
  • This was despite marked differences in school-based standing and sitting exposure.

Higher trait anxiety was independently associated with shorter trunk length in the fully adjusted model.

  • Hierarchical multiple linear regression: β = -0.148, p = 0.022.
  • Adjusted for anthropometric variables, academic year, school-based standing and sitting, and physical activity.

Poorer sleep quality (higher PSQI) was independently associated with shorter trunk length.

  • PSQI β = -0.139, p = 0.032 in the fully adjusted hierarchical model.
  • Academic-year group and school-based standing and sitting durations were not independently associated with trunk length.

The final hierarchical regression model explained 68.4% of the variance in trunk length.

  • The model included anthropometric, academic-year, school-based standing/sitting, physical activity, and psychophysiological variables.

Exploratory mediation analysis found a significant indirect association between emotional exhaustion and trunk length through sleep quality.

  • Indirect effect B = -0.300, 95% bootstrap CI -0.686 to -0.062, p = 0.048.
  • The corresponding direct and total associations were not statistically significant.
  • The analysis was labeled exploratory.

The authors conclude the findings are associations rather than causal or temporal relationships and suggest training should go beyond ergonomics.

  • The study is cross-sectional (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06851780, registered October 28, 2024).
  • They highlight the potential value of educational strategies integrating biomechanical, psychological, and recovery-related factors.

What This Means

This study looked at 132 healthy physiotherapy students, 70 in their third year and 62 in their fourth year, to see whether the spine's shape differed between the two groups. Fourth-year students spent more time standing and less time sitting at school, and reported lower trait anxiety and burnout and more walking. Even so, 3D scans of the back showed no statistically significant differences in trunk length or in the curvature of the upper and lower spine. The upper-back curve was somewhat lower in fourth-year students, but this was just short of statistical significance. Within the whole group, students with higher trait anxiety and poorer sleep quality tended to have shorter trunk length, even after accounting for body size, academic year, standing and sitting time, and physical activity. An exploratory analysis also suggested that emotional exhaustion was linked to trunk length indirectly, through its link with sleep quality. This research suggests that psychological stress and sleep may be related to objectively measured spinal features, and that how long students sit or stand at school may not be the whole story. Because the study captured a single point in time, it cannot show that anxiety or poor sleep changes the spine, or the reverse. The authors suggest that training programs could consider mental and recovery-related factors alongside ergonomics.

Check Your Own Numbers

Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.

Upload Your Labs

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Numano&#x11f;lu E, Ar&#x131;k A, Pamuk&#xe7;u E, Tan&#x131;ml&#x131; Y, Ergit B. (2026). Academic-year differences and psychophysiological associations with objective spinal parameters in physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional DIERS formetric 4D study.. BMC medical education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10505-2