Accuracy Evaluation of the Omron HEM-7120 Automated Oscillometric Upper-arm Home Blood Pressure Monitor in Children and Adolescents Using the AAMI/ESH/ISO 81060-2:2018 Numerical Criteria.
Pisithkul T & Pirojsakul K • Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) • 2026
The Omron HEM-7120 met the numerical accuracy criteria (Criterion 1 and 2) of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard in this cohort of children and adolescents, but because several protocol requirements were not fully met, it is not fully validated under the Universal Standard.
Key Findings
Results
The Omron HEM-7120 met Criterion 1 for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in children and adolescents.
Mean differences between device and mercury auscultatory reference were -4.0 ± 5.94 mmHg for systolic BP.
Mean differences for diastolic BP were -1.8 ± 7.20 mmHg.
Of 90 participants enrolled, 85 were analyzed, yielding 255 paired comparisons.
Reference readings came from two physicians using the same-arm sequential method.
Results
The device met Criterion 2 for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
Standard deviations of the averaged per-participant differences were 5.07 mmHg for systolic and 6.48 mmHg for diastolic BP.
Both values were below the Criterion 2 limits.
Results
The device systematically underestimated systolic and diastolic blood pressure relative to mercury auscultation on average.
Mean device-minus-reference differences were negative for both systolic (-4.0 mmHg) and diastolic (-1.8 mmHg) BP.
The systolic bias was larger in magnitude than the diastolic bias.
Methods
The study design used three cuff sizes covering a range of arm circumferences.
Cuffs covered arm circumferences of 12-18 cm, 17-22 cm, and 22-32 cm.
Each participant's readings were compared sequentially against mercury auscultatory readings.
Conclusions
Several requirements of the Universal Standard protocol were not fully met, so the device is not considered fully validated.
Unmet requirements included age distribution, reference-blood-pressure distribution, and cuff distribution.
Reference-measurement variability and observer qualification requirements were also not fully met.
The authors conclude the device met numerical criteria in this cohort but is not fully validated under the Universal Standard.
What This Means
This study tested how accurate the Omron HEM-7120, a common upper-arm home blood pressure monitor, is in children and teenagers. Researchers compared the device's readings with those taken by two physicians using a traditional mercury device, in 85 young participants (255 paired comparisons), using three different cuff sizes.
On average, the monitor read slightly lower than the reference method: about 4 mmHg lower for the top (systolic) number and about 2 mmHg lower for the bottom (diastolic) number. The spread of differences was within the limits set by the international AAMI/ESH/ISO standard's numerical accuracy criteria.
However, the study did not fully follow all the standard's requirements, including how ages, blood pressure levels, and cuff sizes were distributed, and how reference measurements and observers met the standard. As a result, the device cannot be called fully validated under the standard. This research suggests the monitor performed acceptably in this group, but more complete validation would be needed to confirm its accuracy for children generally.
Pisithkul T, Pirojsakul K. (2026). Accuracy Evaluation of the Omron HEM-7120 Automated Oscillometric Upper-arm Home Blood Pressure Monitor in Children and Adolescents Using the AAMI/ESH/ISO 81060-2:2018 Numerical Criteria.. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.70370