Mental Health

Adaptation and psychometric properties of the life conditions scale in university staff: a study in Spain and Colombia.

TL;DR

The adapted LifeConScale showed an interpretable seven-factor structure with good-to-excellent reliability in 440 university staff from Spain and Colombia, supporting its use as an instrument for health promotion in higher education.

Key Findings

The LifeConScale was adapted for university staff through a Delphi process with health and health-promotion experts, and was tested in a cross-sectional sample of 440 professionals from two universities in Spain and Colombia.

  • The sample included Teaching and Research Staff and Technical, Management, Administrative and Services Staff.
  • The LifeConScale had previously been validated in adolescents, and no instrument integrating lifestyle, emotional wellbeing and mental health existed for university personnel.
  • Adaptation was carried out through a Delphi process.

The data were adequate for factor analysis.

  • Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was 0.850.
  • Bartlett's test was significant (p < 0.001).
  • Internal structure was assessed with common-factor exploratory factor analysis with parallel analysis and oblique rotation.

Parallel analysis and exploratory factor analysis identified seven interpretable factors.

  • The factors were personal wellbeing, anxiety, physical activity, snacking, leisure screen use, social media use, and fruit and vegetable intake.
  • Oblique rotation was used.

The Personal Wellbeing Index and GAD-7 items showed no cross-loadings and a moderate latent correlation, supporting discriminant validity.

  • The abstract describes the latent correlation between the two constructs as moderate.
  • No cross-loadings were observed for these two scales.

Reliability was excellent for anxiety, wellbeing and social media factors.

  • McDonald's omega was 0.929 for anxiety.
  • McDonald's omega was 0.922 for wellbeing.
  • McDonald's omega was 0.920 for social media.

Reliability was good for physical activity, leisure screens, fruit and vegetables, and snacking factors.

  • McDonald's omega was 0.859 for physical activity.
  • McDonald's omega was 0.795 for leisure screens.
  • McDonald's omega was 0.760 for fruit and vegetables.
  • McDonald's omega was 0.753 for snacking.

The AUDIT-C was retained as an independent validated scale, and heterogeneous dietary and sleep indicators were treated as formative rather than aggregated.

  • The AUDIT-C was scored with its original algorithm.
  • Dietary and sleep indicators were not combined into summative scores.

Measurement invariance between Spain and Colombia was examined for the core dimensions of personal wellbeing, anxiety and physical activity.

  • Nested multigroup confirmatory factor analysis tested configural, metric and scalar invariance.
  • The abstract provided does not report the invariance results.

What This Means

This study adapted a questionnaire called the Life Conditions Scale, originally designed for adolescents, so it can be used with university staff. The researchers consulted experts and then tested the tool with 440 teaching, research, technical, administrative and service staff at two universities, one in Spain and one in Colombia. The tool covers lifestyle, emotional wellbeing and mental health. Statistical analysis showed the questionnaire groups into seven distinct areas: personal wellbeing, anxiety, physical activity, snacking, leisure screen use, social media use, and fruit and vegetable intake. Reliability was excellent for anxiety, wellbeing and social media, and good for the other areas. Wellbeing and anxiety were related but distinct, which suggests they measure different things. Alcohol use was measured with an established scale, and dietary and sleep items were kept separate rather than combined into one score. This research suggests the adapted scale could help universities identify lifestyle and mental health factors among their staff to guide health promotion. The researchers also planned to check whether the tool works similarly in Spain and Colombia, but the available summary does not give those results. The study is cross-sectional and covers only two universities, so further testing would be needed in other settings.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

S&#xe1;nchez-Hernando B, Mar&#xed;n-Maicas P, Casa&#xf1;a-Mohedo J, Pell&#xed;n-Carcel&#xe9;n A, L&#xf3;pez-P&#xe9;rez L, Echaniz-Serrano E, et al.. (2026). Adaptation and psychometric properties of the life conditions scale in university staff: a study in Spain and Colombia.. Frontiers in public health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1945598