Sexual Health

Adolescent Voices in Action-Co-Designing Digital Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge Translation Interventions: Community-Based Participatory Action Project.

TL;DR

Co-designing a digital sexual and reproductive health knowledge translation intervention with adolescent advisory groups across three Canadian cities resulted in a culturally relevant, youth-friendly, and credible intervention reflective of adolescents' voices.

Key Findings

A multisite community-based participatory project recruited 26 adolescent participants across three Canadian cities to co-design a digital sexual and reproductive health intervention.

  • Participants were recruited from Edmonton, Vancouver, and Toronto.
  • Adolescent advisory groups (AAGs) were established using a community-based participatory approach and principles of human-centered design.
  • AAG members participated in design-thinking sessions to brainstorm ideas for website design, identify informational needs, and provide iterative feedback.
  • The project was described as a 'large multisite project across 3 cities in Canada.'

Six priority areas for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) content were identified through adolescent advisory group input.

  • The six priority areas were: puberty, menstruation, sexually transmitted infections, healthy relationships, sexual assault, and contraception.
  • These areas were identified through adolescent-led brainstorming and design-thinking sessions.
  • Adolescent input also informed the design's language, visual appeal, and engagement factors.

Engagement strategies including gamification activities, group discussions, and flexible scheduling resulted in high retention and ownership among AAG members.

  • Strategies used included gamification activities, group discussions, and flexible scheduling.
  • These strategies were employed 'to promote meaningful engagement of AAGs at each step.'
  • The outcome was described as 'high retention and ownership of the process among AAG members.'

Adolescents face sociocultural barriers, fear of prejudice, and societal stigma that prevent them from accessing accurate and reliable sexual and reproductive health information.

  • Digital platforms available to adolescents 'may not always be evidence-based and can further spread misinformation.'
  • Digital knowledge translation interventions providing evidence-based SRH information in North America were identified as limited.
  • These barriers motivated the development of an evidence-based, accessible digital intervention.

Co-designing the digital intervention with adolescents strengthened its cultural relevance, youth-friendliness, and credibility.

  • The authors state that 'co-designing with adolescents strengthened the intervention's cultural relevance, youth-friendliness, and credibility.'
  • Adolescent involvement was described as resulting in 'more meaningful, long-term, and youth-friendly solutions.'
  • The process emphasized involving adolescents 'in the design, development, and implementation of the intervention.'

What This Means

This research describes a project in which adolescents across three Canadian cities (Edmonton, Vancouver, and Toronto) were actively involved in designing a website to provide young people with accurate, evidence-based information about sexual and reproductive health (SRH). A total of 26 teenagers participated in advisory groups, using design-thinking activities to help decide what topics the website should cover, how it should look, and how to make it engaging. Through this process, six key topic areas were identified: puberty, menstruation, sexually transmitted infections, healthy relationships, sexual assault, and contraception. The research found that when adolescents are given a genuine role in shaping health resources — including decisions about language, visuals, and content — the resulting tools are more culturally relevant, credible, and youth-friendly. Keeping participants engaged throughout the process was supported by strategies like games, group discussions, and scheduling flexibility, which led to high rates of continued participation and a sense of ownership over the final product. This research suggests that including young people as active collaborators, rather than passive recipients, in the development of health resources leads to better outcomes. It also highlights a gap in the availability of trustworthy, evidence-based digital SRH resources for adolescents in North America, and demonstrates a practical model for how that gap might be addressed by centering adolescent voices in the design process.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Meherali S, Rehmani A, Ahmad M. (2025). Adolescent Voices in Action-Co-Designing Digital Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge Translation Interventions: Community-Based Participatory Action Project.. JMIR human factors. https://doi.org/10.2196/71148