Mental Health

Adolescents' Perspectives on Uptake, Engagement, and Implementation to Inform the Development of a Preventive Transdiagnostic Digital Mental Health Intervention: Qualitative Interview Study.

TL;DR

Adolescents' perspectives highlight that successful implementation of preventive DMHIs requires attention beyond intervention design to preuptake communication strategies, mental health literacy promotion, and integration within adaptive care systems, with clear clinical boundaries and explicit escalation pathways needed to address the tension between desired immediate human support and self-guided delivery.

Key Findings

Interviews with 48 Swiss adolescents yielded 8 main topics and multiple subtopics on anticipated uptake, expected engagement, and implementation of preventive transdiagnostic DMHIs across person, intervention, system, and cross levels.

  • 48 adolescents aged 12-21 years participated (mean age 16.52, SD 2.67; 32/48, 72.9% female).
  • Single semistructured interviews were conducted in person or via video call between January and June 2022 in Switzerland.
  • Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed with hybrid deductive-inductive qualitative content analysis.
  • Intercoder agreement was Cohen κ=0.72.

At the person level, mental health literacy, preuptake communication, and social networks were identified as important factors for anticipated uptake.

  • Person-level factors highlighted the importance of mental health literacy, preuptake communication, and relevance of social networks.
  • Recruitment was by voluntary response sampling via social media and the project website.

At the intervention level, adolescents emphasized usability, personalization, and privacy.

  • These intervention characteristics were described as influencing anticipated uptake and expected engagement.
  • The interviews were conducted in the predesign phase of a transdiagnostic preventive DMHI.

At the system level, adolescents expected adaptive, integrated, and low-threshold mental health services.

  • System-level findings reflected expectations for adaptive, integrated, and low-threshold services.
  • The authors conclude that implementation requires integration within adaptive care systems.

Trust and support emerged as cross-level factors for engagement.

  • These themes spanned person, intervention, and system levels.

Participants described discrepancies between desired intervention characteristics and practical implementation, particularly for personalization, anonymity, peer exchange, and human support.

  • Adolescents desired immediate human-delivered support, which conflicts with the self-guided nature of preventive DMHIs.
  • The authors state this tension underscores the need for clear clinical boundaries and explicit escalation pathways.

Successful implementation of preventive DMHIs requires attention beyond intervention design.

  • Needed elements include preuptake communication strategies, mental health literacy promotion, and integration within adaptive care systems.
  • The study addresses a gap because existing research has predominantly relied on quantitative methods and only partly captured adolescents' perspectives.

What This Means

This Swiss study interviewed 48 adolescents aged 12 to 21 about what would make them likely to try, and keep using, a digital mental health program designed to prevent problems before they develop. The interviews took place before the program was designed, so the teens' views could shape it from the start. The teens' answers touched on three areas: themselves (how much they understand about mental health, what they hear about a program before using it, and the influence of friends and family), the program itself (ease of use, personalization, and privacy), and the wider health system (wanting flexible, connected, easy-to-reach services). Trust and support came up across all areas. Teens also described gaps between what they wanted and what is practical, for example wanting personalized, anonymous, peer-connected, and human-supported help, while preventive programs are usually self-guided. This research suggests that building a good app is not enough. How a program is communicated, how well young people understand mental health, and how the program fits into other care services all appear to matter. The authors also point to the need for clear limits on what such programs can do and for clear routes to human help when needed. The findings come from a self-selected group that was mostly female, so they may not reflect all adolescents.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Hirsig A, Walder N, Häfeli X, Schmidt S. (2026). Adolescents' Perspectives on Uptake, Engagement, and Implementation to Inform the Development of a Preventive Transdiagnostic Digital Mental Health Intervention: Qualitative Interview Study.. Journal of medical Internet research. https://doi.org/10.2196/76494