Sexual Health

Analysing the scientific literature on transgender and gender diverse persons' experiences with sexual and reproductive health care services from an intersectional perspective.

TL;DR

This scoping review found that transgender and gender diverse persons' experiences in sexual and reproductive health care settings are shaped by multiple intersecting systems of oppression including cissexism, heterosexism, racism, classism, geographical disadvantage, and ageism, while methodological challenges in the existing literature hamper a full understanding of these multiple marginalizations.

Key Findings

The scoping review identified 27 studies for in-depth analysis from an initial pool of 1,290 records, revealing a limited evidence base on TGD persons' intersectional experiences in sexual and reproductive health care.

  • 1,290 records were identified and entered into Endnote software X9, with 413 removed before screening.
  • A total of 877 records were screened independently by the author and a research assistant examining titles and abstracts.
  • Only 27 records were selected for in-depth analysis, representing a small fraction of the broader literature.
  • Included studies were uploaded to NVivo 12 and subjected to in-depth review, coding, and synthesis using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
  • Studies were included only if they contained TGD individuals who had accessed SRHC services and data pertaining to forms of oppression, disadvantage, social determinants of health, or aspects of identity intersecting with gender identity.

Multiple intersecting systems of oppression were identified as challenging TGD persons' access to quality sexual and reproductive health care.

  • The intersecting systems identified included cissexism, heterosexism, racism, classism, geographical disadvantage, and ageism.
  • These systems of oppression were found to compound one another in shaping TGD persons' experiences within SRHC settings.
  • The review found that aetiological research has predominantly explained health disparities through a single axis explanation reducing them to factors related to gender identity alone.
  • A one-dimensional representation of TGD persons was found to fail to recognize the multiple experiences of systemic oppression contributing to poor SRH experiences and outcomes.

The existing scientific literature on TGD persons' experiences in SRHC settings is hampered by significant methodological challenges.

  • Methodological limitations identified included adopted sampling techniques, measures used, the use of small and non-representative samples, and geographic location.
  • These challenges were found to hamper efforts to understand TGD persons' experiences of multiple marginalisation in SRHC settings.
  • The review was restricted to studies published in English, conducted in OECD countries, between 2012 and 2022, which may limit the generalizability of findings.
  • Studies were required to present disaggregated data for TGD populations, suggesting many studies in the broader literature do not do so.

Best practices for sexual and reproductive health care delivery to TGD persons were identified across the included studies.

  • Best practices identified included affirming, person-centred care; collaboration; trauma-informed care; and leveraging informal support networks.
  • These practices were described as providing 'hope for improved service provision and design.'
  • The identification of best practices was framed as actionable guidance for improving care quality for TGD populations.
  • These findings were situated within a broader context of systemic barriers that currently limit access to quality care.

TGD persons face considerable challenges accessing sexual and reproductive health care, often resulting in poor health outcomes compared to cisgender persons.

  • The review was motivated by documented health disparities between TGD and cisgender persons in the area of sexual and reproductive health.
  • The review adopted an intersectional framework to move beyond single-axis explanations of these disparities.
  • The scoping review covered studies from OECD countries published between 2012 and 2022, focusing on empirical research with human participants.
  • The review sought to synthesize contemporary scientific research exploring TGD persons' experiences with SRHC services from an intersectional perspective.

What This Means

This research systematically reviewed scientific studies published between 2012 and 2022 to understand how transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people experience sexual and reproductive health care services. The researchers searched five major academic databases and found 1,290 potentially relevant studies, but after careful screening, only 27 met the criteria for in-depth review. A key requirement was that studies had to look at more than just gender identity — they also needed to consider other aspects of people's lives and identities, such as race, class, age, and geography, that might affect their health care experiences. The review found that TGD people face barriers to quality health care that come from multiple overlapping systems of inequality, including cissexism (discrimination based on being transgender), racism, classism, ageism, and living in geographically disadvantaged areas. These barriers do not operate independently — they interact and compound one another. For example, a TGD person who is also a person of color living in a rural area may face a uniquely difficult combination of obstacles. The research also found that most existing studies have focused narrowly on gender identity as the sole explanation for health disparities, missing the bigger picture of how multiple forms of disadvantage shape TGD people's experiences. This research suggests that improving health care for TGD people requires more than addressing gender-based discrimination alone. Promising approaches identified in the literature include care that is affirming and person-centred, trauma-informed, collaborative, and that makes use of informal support networks such as community groups. The study also highlights that the current scientific evidence base has significant gaps — many studies use small, non-representative samples and are limited to certain geographic areas — meaning much more research is needed to fully understand and address these inequities.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Heward-Belle S, Ciftci S, Lovell R. (2025). Analysing the scientific literature on transgender and gender diverse persons' experiences with sexual and reproductive health care services from an intersectional perspective.. International journal for equity in health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02328-8