Mental Health

Androgenetic Alopecia: Narrative Review of Current Therapies and Proposal of a Practical Algorithm for Pharmacological Treatment.

TL;DR

This narrative review summarizes currently available treatments for androgenetic alopecia and proposes a practical management algorithm to help clinicians select the most appropriate therapy for each patient according to clinical experience and disease severity.

Key Findings

Androgenetic alopecia is highly prevalent, affecting 80% of White men and up to 40% of women by age 70 or older.

  • By age 70 or older, 80% of White men show signs of AGA
  • Up to 40% of women show signs of AGA by age 70 or older
  • AGA is characterized by a progressive reduction in hair density following a defined pattern
  • The condition has a substantial impact on mental health and quality of life, particularly among women

Current treatments approved by American and European regulatory agencies have demonstrated safety and efficacy in the management of AGA.

  • Both American and European regulatory agencies have approved treatments for AGA
  • Approved treatments have demonstrated safety and efficacy
  • Several additional therapies have also shown effectiveness beyond approved treatments
  • The absence of randomized clinical trials for additional therapies has limited their inclusion in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC)

The authors propose a practical management algorithm for pharmacological treatment of AGA to guide clinician decision-making.

  • The algorithm is intended to help clinicians select the most appropriate therapy for each patient
  • Selection criteria are based on clinical experience and disease severity
  • The review summarizes currently available treatments alongside the proposed algorithm
  • The algorithm addresses both approved and non-approved therapies with demonstrated effectiveness

AGA has a substantial impact on mental health and quality of life, with women being particularly affected.

  • Mental health impact is noted as a key concern associated with AGA
  • Quality of life impairment is described as substantial
  • Women are specifically identified as experiencing particularly significant quality of life impact
  • This psychosocial burden is presented as a key rationale for optimizing treatment selection

What This Means

This research paper reviews the current state of treatments for androgenetic alopecia (AGA), the most common form of hair loss, which follows a recognizable pattern of progressive thinning. The condition is extremely common, affecting the vast majority of older men and a significant proportion of women, and it can have serious effects on mental health and self-esteem—especially in women. The authors reviewed both officially approved medications and additional therapies that have shown effectiveness in clinical practice but have not yet completed the full process needed for regulatory approval. The paper highlights a gap between what is approved by regulatory agencies like the FDA and EMA and what clinicians may use in practice, since some promising treatments lack the large randomized clinical trials needed for formal approval. To bridge this gap, the authors created a practical decision-making algorithm—essentially a step-by-step guide—to help doctors choose the best treatment option based on how severe a patient's hair loss is and other clinical factors. This research suggests that having a structured, evidence-informed framework could help healthcare providers make more consistent and individualized treatment decisions for people experiencing hair loss. It also underscores the need for more rigorous clinical trials on emerging AGA therapies so that effective treatments can eventually achieve formal regulatory recognition and broader clinical use.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

A. Gómez Zubiaur, S. Vañó-Galván, G. Garnacho-Saucedo. (2026). Androgenetic Alopecia: Narrative Review of Current Therapies and Proposal of a Practical Algorithm for Pharmacological Treatment.. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2026.104687