Cardiovascular

Anterior Versus Posterior Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke and 3-Month Cognitive Profiles: A Single-Center Cohort Study.

TL;DR

In this single-center cohort, patients with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke had higher 3-month PSCI prevalence than those with posterior circulation stroke (54.9% vs 35.5%; adjusted OR 2.18), despite similar global disability, though these group-level associations do not establish a causal effect of territory or a domain-specific diagnosis.

Key Findings

Post-stroke cognitive impairment (MoCA <26, education-adjusted) at 3 months was more prevalent after anterior circulation than posterior circulation infarction.

  • Of 173 enrolled patients, 167 completed follow-up (91 anterior and 76 posterior circulation infarctions).
  • PSCI occurred in 50/91 (54.9%) anterior vs 27/76 (35.5%) posterior patients (p = 0.012).
  • Cognition was assessed in person at 3 months using the Beijing version of the MoCA.
  • Enrollment was of first-ever, MRI-confirmed acute ischemic stroke admitted May 2022 to June 2024.

Anterior circulation stroke was associated with roughly double the odds of PSCI in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses.

  • Unadjusted odds ratio was 2.21 (95% CI, 1.18-4.14).
  • Adjusted odds ratio was 2.18 (95% CI, 1.06-4.49; p = 0.035).

The association persisted in a sensitivity analysis using a stricter MoCA cutoff of <22.

  • PSCI prevalence with the <22 cutoff was 31.9% in anterior vs 15.8% in posterior circulation stroke.
  • Adjusted odds ratio was 2.43 (95% CI, 1.06-5.54; p = 0.035).

Domain-level cognitive performance differed between territories across most MoCA domains, but not attention.

  • After false-discovery-rate correction, differences in visuospatial/executive, naming, delayed-recall, language, abstraction, and orientation performance remained.
  • Attention did not differ between groups.

Cognitive outcomes differed between vascular-territory groups despite similar global disability scores.

  • Global disability was similar between anterior and posterior circulation groups.
  • The authors state the group-level associations do not establish a causal effect of territory or a domain-specific diagnosis.

What This Means

This study followed 167 adults who had a first stroke caused by a blocked blood vessel in the brain, comparing those whose stroke affected the front (anterior) part of the brain's blood supply with those whose stroke affected the back (posterior) part. Three months later, each person took an in-person memory and thinking test (the Beijing version of the MoCA). About 55% of people with front-circulation strokes showed cognitive impairment, compared with about 35% of those with back-circulation strokes. The difference remained after accounting for other factors, with front-circulation stroke linked to about twice the odds of impairment. It also held up when a stricter cutoff for impairment was used. Differences were seen in most thinking areas, including visuospatial/executive skills, naming, delayed recall, language, abstraction, and orientation, but not attention. This gap appeared even though overall disability levels were similar between the two groups. This research suggests that where in the brain a stroke occurs may relate to the pattern and amount of later cognitive problems, and that disability scores alone may miss these differences. However, this was a single-center study with a modest sample, and the authors caution that the findings are group-level associations that do not prove the stroke location causes the differences or serve as a diagnosis of specific cognitive problems in an individual.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Dong S, Li J, Gu Y, Chu H, et al.. (2026). Anterior Versus Posterior Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke and 3-Month Cognitive Profiles: A Single-Center Cohort Study.. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE. https://doi.org/10.3791/73734