Exercise & Training

App-supported versus conventional college physical education: Effects on standardized physical fitness scores and exercise motivation in Chinese university students.

TL;DR

Integrating mobile applications into college PE can enhance skill-related fitness, and the observed motivation profile provides context for students' engagement with the app-supported model, supporting the adoption of blended learning approaches in higher education.

Key Findings

The app-supported training group achieved significantly greater improvements in speed compared to the conventional PE control group.

  • Quasi-experimental design with 90 freshman students over a 10-week period
  • Treatment Group (n=45) used the 'Campus Sports World' app for guided extracurricular training
  • Control Group (n=45) followed traditional instruction
  • Speed was assessed using standardized physical fitness tests pre- and post-intervention

The app-supported training group achieved significantly greater improvements in explosive power compared to the conventional PE control group.

  • Explosive power was among the standardized fitness measures assessed pre- and post-intervention
  • Treatment Group (n=45) versus Control Group (n=45) over 10 weeks
  • The improvement in explosive power was statistically significant in favor of the Treatment Group
  • Participants were freshman university students in China

The app-supported training group achieved significantly greater improvements in flexibility compared to the conventional PE control group.

  • Flexibility was one of four standardized fitness dimensions assessed (speed, endurance, explosive power, and flexibility)
  • Treatment Group (n=45) using the 'Campus Sports World' app showed significantly greater flexibility gains
  • Assessment was conducted pre- and post-intervention across a 10-week period
  • Control Group (n=45) followed traditional PE instruction

No significant difference in endurance performance was found between the app-supported and conventional PE groups.

  • Endurance was one of four standardized fitness dimensions assessed pre- and post-intervention
  • Despite improvements in speed, explosive power, and flexibility, endurance did not differ significantly between groups
  • Treatment Group (n=45) and Control Group (n=45) were compared over the 10-week intervention
  • The lack of endurance difference may reflect limitations of extracurricular app-guided training for aerobic development

Students in the app-supported Treatment Group reported high levels of both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation post-intervention.

  • Motivation was assessed post-intervention only in the Treatment Group (n=45)
  • A questionnaire based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) was used to measure exercise motivation
  • Both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation were reported at high levels
  • Motivation data were collected only from the Treatment Group and not compared to the Control Group

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Liang X, Wang Z. (2026). App-supported versus conventional college physical education: Effects on standardized physical fitness scores and exercise motivation in Chinese university students.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345759