Hormone Therapy

Approach to the Young Male Patient Who Abuses Androgens: Harm Reduction as a Clinical Strategy.

TL;DR

A dual strategy—supporting cessation where possible while mitigating harm where possible—offers a realistic and ethical response to the growing population of androgen abusers and aims to bridge the current gap between clinical care and user behavior.

Key Findings

Nonmedical androgen use is increasingly encountered in clinical practice, particularly among young men engaging in strength training.

  • Many users present with androgen-related complaints or complications.
  • Clinician unfamiliarity, stigma, or the perceived need for abstinence as a condition for care limits medical support for this population.
  • The paper identifies a growing gap between clinical care and user behavior.

A nonjudgmental diagnostic approach is recommended as the foundation for engaging with androgen-abusing patients in clinical practice.

  • The framework emphasizes avoiding stigma and not requiring abstinence as a precondition for care.
  • Two parallel management strategies are outlined depending on patient motivation to discontinue use.
  • The approach draws on extensive clinical experience rather than randomized trial data.

For individuals motivated to discontinue androgen use, structured monitoring and psychological support are key components of management.

  • The goal of this strategy is facilitating hormonal recovery and reducing relapse risk.
  • Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) should only be considered if biochemical hypogonadism with symptoms persists after at least 12 months of abstinence.
  • TRT in this context should be administered in line with standard clinical guidelines.

For patients unwilling or not yet ready to stop androgen use, a harm reduction approach is proposed to minimize health risks.

  • Harm reduction recommendations include dose reduction, compound selection, cycle structuring, and cardiovascular risk management.
  • This approach is presented as a realistic and ethical response rather than requiring abstinence.
  • Cardiovascular risk management is specifically highlighted as a component of harm reduction.

The dual strategy of supporting cessation where possible and mitigating harm where possible is framed as an ethical and practical clinical framework.

  • The framework is intended to bridge the current gap between clinical care and user behavior.
  • The approach acknowledges that some patients are not ready or willing to stop androgen use.
  • The article outlines these strategies as complementary rather than mutually exclusive.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Smit D, Verdegaal T, Bond P, de Ronde W. (2025). Approach to the Young Male Patient Who Abuses Androgens: Harm Reduction as a Clinical Strategy.. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf496