Sexual Health

Are facility service delivery models meeting the sexual and reproductive health needs of adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa? A qualitative evidence synthesis.

TL;DR

Facility-based SRH service delivery models can improve access to information and services for adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa when complemented with community-based interventions, adolescent-friendly providers, and assurance of service accessibility, but significant gaps including healthcare providers' negative attitudes, privacy concerns, financial constraints, and transportation challenges limit their effectiveness.

Key Findings

Three distinct facility-based adolescent-friendly SRH delivery models are used in Sub-Saharan Africa: Stand-alone clinics, Youth-friendly corners, and Integrated/mainstreamed models.

  • The review identified these three models through a systematic search of 14,415 articles, of which 20 papers met inclusion criteria.
  • Stand-alone clinics operate as dedicated facilities exclusively for adolescents.
  • Youth-friendly corners are designated spaces within existing health facilities.
  • Integrated/mainstreamed models incorporate adolescent SRH services within general health services.
  • Databases searched included Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar, with PRISMA guidelines followed.

Adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa expressed the need for comprehensive SRH information, adolescent-friendly facilities, parental and male involvement, and respectful healthcare providers.

  • These needs were identified through thematic synthesis across the 20 included qualitative studies.
  • Adolescents specifically identified respectful and non-judgmental healthcare providers as a key need.
  • The need for parental and male partner involvement was highlighted as important to adolescent SRH service uptake.
  • Adolescents desired facilities that were physically and socially accessible and welcoming to their age group.

Adolescent-friendly interventions, friendly staff, and accessibility were identified as facilitators that promote positive SRH service experiences among adolescents.

  • These facilitators were reported consistently across studies included in the qualitative evidence synthesis.
  • Friendly and non-judgmental staff were a key driver of adolescents' willingness to seek and return for SRH services.
  • Physical and geographic accessibility of facilities was reported as promoting service uptake.
  • Community-based interventions were identified as complementary facilitators to facility-based models.

Negative attitudes of health workers were identified as a major barrier to effective SRH service delivery for adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa.

  • Healthcare provider negative attitudes and behaviours were among the most consistently reported barriers across the 20 included studies.
  • Providers' judgmental or stigmatizing behavior discouraged adolescents from seeking SRH services.
  • This barrier was present across all three facility-based delivery models identified in the review.
  • The review calls for enhanced provider training to address this gap.

Lack of confidentiality and privacy was a significant barrier limiting adolescents' use of facility-based SRH services.

  • Concerns about confidentiality were reported across multiple studies in the synthesis.
  • Adolescents feared that their personal health information could be disclosed to parents, community members, or others.
  • Intimidating environments within health facilities also contributed to adolescents avoiding services.
  • The review recommends strengthening confidentiality assurances as a priority intervention.

Financial constraints and transportation challenges were structural barriers preventing adolescents from accessing facility-based SRH services.

  • These barriers were identified alongside negative provider attitudes and lack of confidentiality as key limiting factors.
  • Financial constraints were compounded by broader contextual factors including poverty and illiteracy noted in the study population.
  • Transportation challenges particularly affected adolescents in rural or remote areas of Sub-Saharan Africa.
  • The review recommends reducing financial barriers and expanding out-of-facility services to address these structural issues.

Waiting time and intimidating environments at health facilities were additional barriers discouraging adolescent use of SRH services.

  • Long waiting times were reported as a deterrent to adolescents seeking SRH care at facilities.
  • Intimidating clinical environments made adolescents feel unwelcome or fearful.
  • These barriers were identified through thematic analysis using Thomas and Harden's approach managed with NVIVO 12 PRO software.
  • These factors contributed to the overall finding that current facility models do not fully meet adolescent SRH needs.

The review recommends expanding out-of-facility services and adopting mHealth solutions to complement facility-based SRH delivery models for adolescents.

  • mHealth solutions were identified as a promising approach to reaching adolescents who face barriers to facility-based care.
  • Community-based interventions were found to be important complements to facility-based models.
  • The recommendation for out-of-facility expansion was driven by findings that current models leave significant gaps in service delivery.
  • These recommendations were framed as necessary to ensure equitable and effective access to SRH services for adolescents across Sub-Saharan Africa.

What This Means

This research reviewed 20 qualitative studies from Sub-Saharan Africa to understand how well health facility-based programs meet the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs of adolescents. The researchers found three main types of facility models being used: clinics dedicated only to adolescents, special youth-friendly corners within regular health facilities, and services integrated into general health care. Adolescents said they needed comprehensive health information, welcoming facilities, supportive parents and male partners, and respectful healthcare providers. The research found that when facilities have friendly staff and are accessible, adolescents are more likely to use SRH services and have positive experiences. However, several serious problems limit how well these models work. Healthcare workers frequently displayed negative, judgmental attitudes toward adolescents seeking SRH care. Many young people also feared their private health information would be shared with parents or community members. Cost and transportation difficulties made it hard for adolescents — especially those in rural areas or living in poverty — to reach facilities at all. Long waiting times and unwelcoming clinical environments were additional deterrents. This research suggests that no single facility model is sufficient on its own to meet adolescents' SRH needs in Sub-Saharan Africa. Improving outcomes will require training healthcare providers to be non-judgmental and respectful, strengthening privacy protections, reducing costs, expanding services beyond clinics into communities, and using mobile health technology to reach young people where they are. The findings highlight that both the design of services and the attitudes of those delivering them must change for adolescents to receive the care they need.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Sanyang Y, Sanyang S, Ladur A, Cham M, Desmond N, Mgawadere F. (2025). Are facility service delivery models meeting the sexual and reproductive health needs of adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa? A qualitative evidence synthesis.. BMC health services research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12344-1