Cardiovascular

Assessing the Impact of a Training Intervention on Venous Compression Bandaging Application: A Factorial Design Randomised Trial.

TL;DR

A one-hour behaviourist-based training intervention did not significantly improve compression bandaging quality (CCB score) among advanced practice nursing students, and improvements observed at one month were not sustained at three months.

Key Findings

At baseline, compression bandaging quality was low among advanced practice nursing students.

  • Mean CCB score (0-7 scale) at baseline was 3.78
  • Installation conformity at baseline was 52%
  • Study enrolled 50 advanced practice nursing students (APNS) in France
  • Assessments were performed on a mannequin leg

The one-hour training intervention did not significantly improve the primary outcome of compression bandaging quality (CCB score) compared to controls.

  • Adjusted difference in CCB score between intervention and control groups: -0.43
  • 95% CI: -1.01 to 0.15, indicating no statistically significant improvement
  • The trial used a 2×2 factorial randomised open-label design
  • The intervention was a one-hour behaviourist-based training session

A significant interaction between bandage type and training intervention was found for installation conformity.

  • Installation conformity showed a tendency to improve with system B following the intervention
  • Installation conformity showed a tendency to decrease with system A following the intervention
  • Two different compression bandage types (system A and system B) were compared within the factorial design

Improvements in compression bandaging observed at one month were not sustained at three months.

  • The study assessed sustainability of the training intervention over a three-month follow-up period
  • Any improvements seen at the one-month follow-up point were lost by the three-month assessment
  • This indicates the brief training intervention lacked long-term efficacy for skill retention

Application time decreased over the course of follow-up, and system B was applied more efficiently than system A.

  • Application time was a secondary outcome measure
  • System B demonstrated more efficient application compared to system A across the study period
  • The reduction in application time occurred regardless of training intervention assignment

Brief, behaviourist-based training was identified as insufficient to achieve lasting compression bandaging skill improvement.

  • Authors identified the need for repeated group practice, feedback, and integration into relevant clinical contexts
  • The training duration was one hour
  • The findings suggest that more comprehensive educational approaches are required to enhance compression bandaging proficiency
  • Compression therapy is described as the gold-standard treatment for venous leg ulcers (VLU)

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Danjou A, Bouisse M, Dumas G, Richaud C, Marchais-Fiot E, Blaise S. (2026). Assessing the Impact of a Training Intervention on Venous Compression Bandaging Application: A Factorial Design Randomised Trial.. International wound journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70804