Chronotype is independently associated with dual-task gait cost in a task-domain-specific manner, with stronger effects for phonological and sequential tasks than for arithmetic processing.
Key Findings
Results
Serial subtraction by seven (SS7) produced the largest mean velocity dual-task cost compared to the other two cognitive conditions.
SS7 produced a mean velocity DTC of -12.76%
This was significantly greater than backward word spelling (5LWB) at -7.95% (p = 0.002)
SS7 was also significantly greater than reverse month recitation (RMR) at -9.57% (p = 0.021)
Condition differences were assessed with nonparametric tests and post-hoc comparisons
Results
MEQ score independently predicted mean velocity dual-task gait cost during backward word spelling (phonological task).
β = -0.51, p < 0.001, R² = 0.269 in the multiple linear regression model
Greater morningness (higher MEQ score) was associated with better gait-speed preservation under cognitive load
The model adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and baseline gait velocity
Sample consisted of 69 healthy young adults with mean age 21.3 years
Results
MEQ score independently predicted mean velocity dual-task gait cost during reverse month recitation (sequential task).
β = -0.55, p = 0.004, R² = 0.222 in the multiple linear regression model
Greater morningness was associated with better gait-speed preservation under this sequential cognitive load
The model adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and baseline gait velocity
The association was statistically significant unlike that for SS7
Results
MEQ score did not significantly predict mean velocity dual-task gait cost during serial subtraction by seven (arithmetic task).
β = -0.33, p = 0.071 in the multiple linear regression model
Despite SS7 producing the largest gait interference overall, the chronotype association was the weakest for this condition
The authors suggest 'arithmetic dual-task disruption may be less sensitive to circadian arousal'
The model was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and baseline gait velocity
Results
Exploratory Spearman correlations showed MEQ-DTC associations were broadest in the phonological task and narrowest in the arithmetic task across gait parameters.
MEQ-DTC associations were found across 7 of 8 gait parameters in the 5LWB (phonological) condition
Associations were present in 4 of 8 parameters in the RMR (sequential) condition
Associations were present in only 3 of 8 parameters in the SS7 (arithmetic) condition
Eight spatiotemporal gait parameters were examined in total using three-dimensional motion capture
Methods
The study sample consisted of 69 healthy young adults assessed with standardized chronotype and gait measurement tools.
37 of 69 participants were female; mean age was 21.3 years
Chronotype was measured using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ)
Spatiotemporal gait parameters were recorded with three-dimensional motion capture
Three dual-task conditions were used: backward word spelling (5LWB), serial subtraction by seven (SS7), and reverse month recitation (RMR)
DTC was calculated for eight gait parameters
Discussion
The authors identify fixed testing time and cross-sectional design as key limitations that could conflate chronotype effects with time-of-day confounds.
All participants were tested at a single fixed time point, preventing separation of chronotype from time-of-day effects
The cross-sectional design precludes causal inference
The authors call for 'within-subject, multi-timepoint studies to confirm chronotype effects separate from time-of-day confounds'
These limitations apply to interpretation of all regression and correlation findings
What This Means
This research suggests that a person's chronotype — whether they are naturally a 'morning person' or an 'evening person' — is related to how much their walking is affected when they try to think at the same time. The study tested 69 healthy young adults by measuring their walking patterns while they performed three different mental tasks: spelling words backwards, subtracting numbers by seven, and reciting months in reverse order. People who scored higher on a morningness scale (morning chronotypes) tended to maintain their normal walking speed better when mentally multitasking, particularly for the word-spelling and month-recitation tasks.
The arithmetic task (subtracting by sevens) caused the biggest overall disruption to walking, but interestingly, chronotype had the weakest relationship with performance on this task. This suggests that different types of mental tasks may interact with a person's internal body clock differently — phonological and sequential thinking seem more sensitive to chronotype than arithmetic processing. This pattern held even after accounting for factors like age, sex, BMI, and baseline walking speed.
This research matters because it highlights that who someone is biologically (a morning or evening type) may influence how well they can handle everyday activities that require simultaneous thinking and walking, such as navigating a busy environment while talking or planning. However, since all participants were tested at one fixed time of day and the study was cross-sectional, it is not yet possible to say whether the findings reflect chronotype itself or simply the time of day testing occurred. Future studies tracking the same individuals at multiple times of day would be needed to clarify this distinction.
Check Your Own Numbers
Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.
Kim M, Dalbah J, Al-Sharman A. (2026). Association between chronotype and dual-task gait cost across distinct cognitive domains in healthy young adults.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0348387