Association between medication adherence and glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes in Luzhou: a retrospective cohort study (2018-2023).
Patients with consistent medication adherence achieved significantly higher glycaemic control rates than intermittent adherents, and poor adherence to medical advice reduced glycaemic control success by 29.4%, while hypertension comorbidity and lifestyle factors moderated this association.
Key Findings
Results
Consistent medication adherence was associated with significantly higher glycaemic control rates compared to intermittent adherence.
Patients with consistent adherence achieved glycaemic control rates of 39.6% (95% CI 38.8% to 40.4%)
Intermittent adherents achieved glycaemic control rates of only 20.8% (95% CI 19.9% to 21.7%)
The difference was statistically significant (p<0.001)
Study included 30,508 T2D patients from the Luzhou City Health Information Management System over 2018-2023
Results
Intermittent medication adherence reduced glycaemic control success rate by 29.4% compared to consistent adherence.
Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for intermittent versus consistent adherence was 0.706 (95% CI 0.643 to 0.774)
Poor adherence to medical advice was identified as a major barrier to effective blood glucose control
This association was found after adjusting for other covariates in a retrospective cohort design
The association varied according to hypertension comorbidity and lifestyle factors
Results
Male gender was negatively associated with glycaemic control among T2D patients.
aOR for male gender was 0.879 (95% CI 0.813 to 0.950)
This indicates males had lower odds of achieving glycaemic control compared to females
Finding was derived from adjusted multivariable analysis in a cohort of 30,508 patients
Results
Higher educational attainment was positively associated with glycaemic control.
aOR for higher educational attainment was 1.004 (95% CI 1.002 to 1.007)
The association was statistically significant despite the modest effect size
Educational attainment was identified as a modifiable factor relevant to targeted diabetes management strategies
Results
Temporary residence status was marginally positively associated with glycaemic control, suggesting disparities between urban and rural areas.
aOR for temporary residence status was 1.064 (95% CI 1.013 to 1.117)
Authors interpreted this as suggesting 'potential disparities in access to medical resources between urban and rural areas'
The benefit was described as 'marginal' by the authors
Study was conducted in western China (Luzhou City), a resource-constrained setting
Results
The association between medication adherence and glycaemic control varied according to hypertension comorbidity and lifestyle factors.
Hypertension comorbidity was identified as a moderating factor of the adherence-glycaemic control relationship
Lifestyle factors also moderated the association between medication adherence and glycaemic control
Findings advocated for 'integrated care models that simultaneously address cardiovascular risk factors and promote behavioural modifications'
The study population was drawn from a retrospective cohort of 30,508 T2D patients over a 5-year period (2018-2023)
Yang M, Zhou D, He L, Ren N, Li Y, Fan S. (2026). Association between medication adherence and glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes in Luzhou: a retrospective cohort study (2018-2023).. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107509