Association Between Relative Fat Mass and the Serum Creatinine/Cystatin C Ratio and Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity: Evidence From Two Large Population-Based Surveys.
Hu Y, Li L, et al. • Journal of diabetes research • 2026
SCR/CysC levels were negatively correlated with CMM risk, whereas RFM levels showed a positive correlation, suggesting both may serve as potential biomarkers for CMM screening.
Key Findings
Results
Higher SCR/CysC levels were significantly negatively associated with the risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity in both Chinese and American populations.
Study included 9292 Chinese participants from the CHARLS database and 3822 American individuals from the NHANES database.
In CHARLS, the highest quartile (Q4) of SCR/CysC compared to the lowest quartile (Q1) was associated with decreased CMM risk: OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.87–0.91, p < 0.001.
In NHANES, the highest quartile (Q4) of SCR/CysC compared to Q1 was associated with decreased CMM risk: OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86–0.94, p < 0.001.
Multivariate logistic regression, restricted cubic spline plots, and subgroup analyses were used to explore these associations.
Results were consistent after adjusting for multiple confounding factors.
Results
Higher relative fat mass (RFM) levels were significantly positively associated with the risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity in both cohorts.
In CHARLS, the highest quartile (Q4) of RFM compared to Q1 was associated with increased CMM risk: OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.16–1.21, p < 0.001.
In NHANES, the highest quartile (Q4) of RFM compared to Q1 was associated with increased CMM risk: OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.15–1.25, p < 0.001.
The association was replicated independently in two large population-based surveys from different countries.
RCS plot results supported a positive relationship between RFM and CMM risk after adjustment for multiple confounding factors.
Results
Restricted cubic spline analyses confirmed nonlinear dose-response relationships between both SCR/CysC and RFM with CMM risk.
RCS plots demonstrated that a decrease in SCR/CysC was associated with a higher risk of CMM.
RCS plots demonstrated that an increase in RFM was associated with a higher risk of CMM.
These relationships were observed after adjusting for multiple confounding factors.
Findings were consistent across both the CHARLS and NHANES databases.
Conclusions
SCR/CysC and RFM reflect muscle and fat content respectively and are proposed as potential biomarkers for cardiometabolic multimorbidity screening.
SCR/CysC is described as an important indicator reflecting muscle content, while RFM reflects fat content.
Both indicators are stated to be closely related to metabolic diseases and cardiovascular diseases.
The authors propose these measures may serve as tools for early identification and intervention of CMM.
The study provides evidence from two large population-based surveys to support this proposed clinical utility.
Methods
The study populations included large samples from both China and the United States to provide cross-national evidence.
9292 Chinese participants were drawn from the CHARLS (China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study) database.
3822 American individuals were drawn from the NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) database.
Total combined sample size across both databases was 13,114 participants.
Subgroup analyses were also performed in addition to multivariate logistic regression and RCS analyses.
Hu Y, Li L, Yan L, Zhao X, Wang Q, Xu Z. (2026). Association Between Relative Fat Mass and the Serum Creatinine/Cystatin C Ratio and Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity: Evidence From Two Large Population-Based Surveys.. Journal of diabetes research. https://doi.org/10.1155/jdr/4075738