Primary patency after iliofemoral venous stenting was similarly high with dual-pathway antithrombotic therapy (anticoagulation plus antiplatelet therapy) and anticoagulation alone, though an exploratory analysis suggested a possible association between AC+APT and improved patency in patients with post-thrombotic syndrome.
Key Findings
Results
Overall primary stent patency was high regardless of antithrombotic regimen during a median follow-up of 24 months.
247 total patients were included across multiple centers, with stent implantations performed between 2019 and 2024
Median follow-up was 24 months (IQR, 15-38 months)
Overall primary patency rate was 91.1%
Study design was ambispective (combining retrospective and prospective data collection) and multicenter
Results
Dual-pathway antithrombotic therapy (AC+APT) did not significantly differ from anticoagulation alone in primary patency in the overall cohort.
145 patients received AC+APT and 102 received AC alone
Log-rank P = 1.00 for comparison of primary patency between AC+APT and AC groups in the overall cohort
No statistically significant difference in primary stent patency was detected between the two treatment strategies
Results
In the post-thrombotic syndrome subgroup, anticoagulation alone was associated with a higher risk of patency loss compared with dual-pathway antithrombotic therapy.
Hazard ratio for patency loss with AC alone vs. AC+APT in the post-thrombotic syndrome subgroup was 3.31 (95% CI, 1.02-10.74; P = .047)
This finding was characterized as exploratory analysis
The association suggests a possible benefit of adding antiplatelet therapy to anticoagulation specifically in post-thrombotic syndrome patients
Methods
Cox regression was used to identify independent predictors of loss of primary patency after iliofemoral venous stenting.
Cox proportional hazards regression was the primary statistical method for identifying predictors of patency loss
Patients were categorized by postoperative antithrombotic regimen: AC+APT versus AC alone
The study used consecutive patient enrollment to reduce selection bias
Conclusions
The authors concluded that adequately powered randomized trials with longer follow-up are needed to confirm the possible association between AC+APT and improved patency in post-thrombotic syndrome patients.
The post-thrombotic syndrome subgroup finding was described as an 'exploratory analysis'
Long-term safety assessment of dual-pathway therapy was noted as an unresolved issue
The optimal antithrombotic strategy after iliofemoral venous stenting was characterized as 'uncertain' at the outset of the study
What This Means
This research suggests that after having a stent placed in the large veins of the pelvis and upper leg (iliofemoral veins), patients do well overall whether they take blood thinners alone or blood thinners combined with antiplatelet drugs (like aspirin or clopidogrel). In a study of 247 patients followed for about two years, over 91% of stents remained open and functioning, and there was no meaningful difference in stent patency between the two medication groups when looking at all patients together.
However, the study found a potentially important exception: among patients who had post-thrombotic syndrome — a chronic condition caused by prior blood clots that damage vein valves and walls — those taking blood thinners alone were about three times more likely to lose stent patency compared to those on the combined regimen. This finding was described as exploratory, meaning it was not the main question the study was designed to answer and should be interpreted cautiously.
This research matters because there is currently no established standard for what medications patients should take after venous stenting, and doctors vary in their approaches. While the overall results are reassuring that both strategies work well, the suggestion that post-thrombotic syndrome patients might particularly benefit from combined therapy warrants further investigation. The authors note that larger, randomized clinical trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm this possible benefit and to fully evaluate the bleeding risks that come with using two types of blood-thinning medications together.
Chen C, Guo Z, Tang J, Wei Z, Liu G, Shi Z, et al.. (2026). Association of dual-pathway antithrombotic therapy with primary patency after iliofemoral venous stenting: a multicenter cohort study.. Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2026.106965