Sexual Health

Associations Between State Laws Regulating Minors' Access to Confidential Sexual Health Services and Lifetime HIV Testing Among U.S. Male High School Students.

TL;DR

Certain confidentiality-promoting state laws are associated with increased lifetime HIV testing among sexually active male adolescents, regardless of sexual behavior (YMSM vs. YMSWO).

Key Findings

State laws explicitly allowing minors to self-consent to HIV testing were associated with significantly higher odds of lifetime HIV testing among male high school students.

  • Adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05–1.21, p < .001
  • Analysis adjusted for individual- and state-level characteristics
  • Sample drawn from 2019 state-level Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System across 23 states (N = 17,509 sexually active male high school students)

State laws that did not permit parental notification were associated with significantly higher odds of lifetime HIV testing.

  • aOR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05–1.12, p < .001
  • This was one of four confidentiality-promoting law types examined
  • Effect held after adjusting for individual- and state-level covariates

State confidentiality protections for insured dependents were associated with the largest increase in odds of lifetime HIV testing among the law types examined.

  • aOR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.34–1.45, p < .001
  • This was the strongest association found among the four confidentiality-related law provisions examined
  • Applies to minors covered under a parent's or guardian's insurance plan

States lacking age clauses (i.e., no minimum age to self-consent to sexual health services) were associated with significantly lower odds of lifetime HIV testing.

  • aOR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.80–0.84, p < .001
  • This finding was in the opposite direction from the other three confidentiality-promoting law provisions
  • The absence of an age clause was treated as a confidentiality-promoting feature, yet was paradoxically associated with reduced HIV testing

YMSM status did not moderate the association between confidentiality-promoting state laws and lifetime HIV testing.

  • No statistically significant interaction was found between YMSM status and any of the four law types on HIV testing outcomes
  • YMSM subsample: n = 1,718; young men who have sex with women only (YMSWO) subsample: n = 15,791
  • Authors concluded that 'the effects of laws being confidentiality-promoting on HIV testing did not differ significantly for YMSM and YMSWO'

The study used multilevel logistic regression to examine associations between state-level confidentiality laws and HIV testing in a large, representative sample of male adolescents.

  • Data source: 2019 state-level Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) across 23 states
  • Total analytic sample: N = 17,509 sexually active male high school students
  • Four confidentiality-promoting law types were examined: explicit minor self-consent to HIV testing, absence of age clause for sexual health services, absence of parental notification, and confidentiality protections for insured dependents
  • Models adjusted for individual- and state-level characteristics

Confidentiality concerns are identified as a well-established barrier to sexual health services for adolescents, and are considered likely greater for YMSM due to multilevel stigma.

  • The background frames YMSM as facing stigma at multiple levels that may compound confidentiality barriers
  • The study was motivated by the gap in understanding how state-level confidentiality laws affect HIV testing uptake in this population
  • Prior literature on confidentiality barriers to adolescent sexual health care is cited as the foundation for the research question

What This Means

This research suggests that the laws in a state governing whether teenagers can privately access sexual health services — without parental knowledge or consent — are meaningfully linked to whether teenage boys get tested for HIV. Using a large, nationally representative survey of over 17,000 sexually active male high school students across 23 states, researchers found that teens in states with stronger privacy protections (such as laws allowing minors to consent to their own HIV test, laws blocking mandatory parental notification, and laws protecting the insurance privacy of dependents) were more likely to have ever been tested for HIV. The strongest association was with insurance confidentiality protections, where students in those states had 40% higher odds of having been tested. Interestingly, the researchers also found that laws without a minimum age requirement for self-consenting to sexual health services were actually associated with lower HIV testing rates — the opposite of what might be expected — suggesting that not all policies framed as confidentiality-promoting work equally in practice. Importantly, these associations were similar for young men who have sex with men (YMSM) and those who only have sex with women, meaning the legal environment appears to matter for all sexually active male teens, not just those at traditionally higher HIV risk. This research suggests that state-level legal policies around confidentiality in healthcare can have real-world effects on whether adolescents seek out HIV testing. Given that confidentiality is a known barrier to teens accessing sexual health services, these findings highlight the potential public health value of policies that protect minors' privacy when seeking sexual health care, including HIV testing.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Aivadyan C, El-Bassel N, Chang M, Santelli J, Philbin M, Wu E. (2025). Associations Between State Laws Regulating Minors' Access to Confidential Sexual Health Services and Lifetime HIV Testing Among U.S. Male High School Students.. AIDS and behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04574-x