Cardiovascular

Associations of Arm-to-Waist Ratio With Hypertension and Blood Pressure: The Role of Peripheral-Central Body Size Distribution in U.S. Individuals.

TL;DR

AWR is independently and inversely associated with hypertension and blood pressure in U.S. individuals, exhibiting notable sex differences, highlighting the potential importance of peripheral-central body size distribution in hypertension development.

Key Findings

The prevalence of hypertension decreased progressively across increasing quartiles of arm-to-waist ratio (AWR).

  • Overall, 15,211 (30%) of 50,656 participants had hypertension.
  • Hypertension prevalence across AWR quartiles was 47.5%, 32.2%, 23.6%, and 16.9%, respectively.
  • The trend was statistically significant (P for trend < 0.001).
  • Data were drawn from NHANES 1999–2018.

Each 1% increment in AWR was associated with lower odds of hypertension after multivariable adjustment.

  • Adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 0.97 (95% CI 0.96–0.97; P < 0.001).
  • Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess hypertension outcomes.
  • This inverse association was independent of other covariates included in the model.

BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and arm circumference (AC) were all positively associated with hypertension, in contrast to AWR's inverse association.

  • All four anthropometric indices were positively associated with hypertension (all P < 0.001).
  • AWR was correlated with BMI (r = -0.16), WC (r = -0.41), WHtR (r = -0.46), and AC (r = 0.16; all P < 0.001).
  • Pearson correlation analyses were used to evaluate correlations among anthropometric indices and blood pressure.
  • The contrasting direction of AWR's association compared to other indices highlights the distinct role of peripheral-central body size distribution.

Significant interaction effects were observed between AWR and both age and sex in their associations with hypertension.

  • Both interaction terms (AWR × age and AWR × sex) were statistically significant (both P for interaction < 0.001).
  • Notable sex differences were observed in the AWR–hypertension relationship.

Nonlinear associations were observed between AWR and hypertension, with differences by sex.

  • In men: P for overall < 0.001 and P for nonlinearity < 0.001.
  • In women: P for overall = 0.051 and P for nonlinearity = 0.021.
  • These nonlinear associations were identified after multivariable adjustment.

Among individuals without prior hypertension, increased AWR was independently associated with lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP).

  • Both SBP and DBP associations were statistically significant (both P < 0.001).
  • Multivariable linear regression was used to assess blood pressure outcomes.
  • This analysis was restricted to participants without a prior diagnosis of hypertension.

What This Means

This research suggests that how body size is distributed between the arms (peripheral) and the waist (central) matters for blood pressure and hypertension risk. Using data from over 50,000 U.S. adults collected between 1999 and 2018, researchers found that people with a higher arm-to-waist ratio (AWR) — meaning relatively larger arms compared to their waist — were significantly less likely to have hypertension. As AWR increased across four groups, the share of people with hypertension dropped from nearly half (47.5%) to less than one in five (16.9%). This pattern held even after accounting for other health and demographic factors. Interestingly, this finding runs counter to the pattern seen with other common body size measures like BMI, waist circumference, and waist-to-height ratio, all of which were associated with higher hypertension risk. The AWR's inverse relationship with blood pressure was also present among people who did not already have hypertension, where higher AWR was linked to lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings. The relationship between AWR and hypertension was not a simple straight line — it curved — and the pattern differed between men and women. This research suggests that where fat and muscle are distributed on the body — not just total body size — may be an important but underappreciated factor in understanding hypertension risk. Measuring the balance between arm size and waist size could potentially offer additional information beyond standard measurements like BMI when evaluating cardiovascular health risk. However, more research would be needed to understand the biological mechanisms involved and whether interventions that shift body size distribution could affect blood pressure outcomes.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Fang Z, Zhou Z, Zhang J, Zhang Y. (2026). Associations of Arm-to-Waist Ratio With Hypertension and Blood Pressure: The Role of Peripheral-Central Body Size Distribution in U.S. Individuals.. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.). https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.70354