Cardiovascular

Balloon-expandable valve vs. self-expandable valve for small aortic annuli: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and updated meta-analysis.

TL;DR

In patients with small aortic annuli undergoing TAVR, balloon-expandable valves and self-expandable valves yield comparable rates of prosthesis-patient mismatch and permanent pacemaker implantation, though BEV may be associated with a higher risk of moderate or greater paravalvular leak.

Key Findings

The risk of new permanent pacemaker implantation was similar between balloon-expandable valves and self-expandable valves in patients with small aortic annuli.

  • OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.67–1.59, P = 0.89
  • Analysis included 14 studies comprising 8451 patients (4797 BEV, 3654 SEV)
  • Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool odds ratios
  • Certainty of evidence was rated as moderate using the GRADE approach

Balloon-expandable valves were associated with a near-significant increase in moderate or greater paravalvular leak compared to self-expandable valves.

  • OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.00–1.93, P = 0.05
  • The result did not reach conventional statistical significance (P < 0.05) but trended toward higher risk with BEV
  • This was one of the two primary outcomes of the meta-analysis
  • Certainty of evidence was rated as moderate

There was no significant difference in severe prosthesis-patient mismatch between balloon-expandable valves and self-expandable valves.

  • OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.27–1.37, P = 0.23 for severe PPM
  • OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.45–1.38, P = 0.40 for moderate/severe PPM
  • Both comparisons were non-significant
  • Random-effects models were used

Mean indexed effective orifice area did not differ significantly between balloon-expandable valves and self-expandable valves.

  • MD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.11, P = 0.93
  • This was a secondary hemodynamic outcome
  • Analysis was based on the pooled data from 14 included studies

Mean transvalvular gradients showed no significant difference between valve types, though self-expandable valves showed a trend toward lower gradients.

  • MD = -0.91 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.38 to 1.57, P = 0.47
  • The trend toward lower gradients with SEV did not reach statistical significance
  • This was a secondary hemodynamic outcome assessed in the meta-analysis

The systematic review and meta-analysis included 14 studies with 8451 patients undergoing TAVR for small aortic annuli.

  • 4797 patients received balloon-expandable valves and 3654 received self-expandable valves
  • Studies were identified through a comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and other databases up to July 2025
  • Data extraction and quality assessment followed Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines
  • The GRADE approach was used to assess certainty of evidence, rated as moderate across most outcomes

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Alam U, Shahid A, Qadri M, Khan H, Rath S, Sriram K, et al.. (2026). Balloon-expandable valve vs. self-expandable valve for small aortic annuli: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and updated meta-analysis.. Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.). https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001851