In patients with small aortic annuli undergoing TAVR, balloon-expandable valves and self-expandable valves yield comparable rates of prosthesis-patient mismatch and permanent pacemaker implantation, though BEV may be associated with a higher risk of moderate or greater paravalvular leak.
Key Findings
Results
The risk of new permanent pacemaker implantation was similar between balloon-expandable valves and self-expandable valves in patients with small aortic annuli.
Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool odds ratios
Certainty of evidence was rated as moderate using the GRADE approach
Results
Balloon-expandable valves were associated with a near-significant increase in moderate or greater paravalvular leak compared to self-expandable valves.
OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.00–1.93, P = 0.05
The result did not reach conventional statistical significance (P < 0.05) but trended toward higher risk with BEV
This was one of the two primary outcomes of the meta-analysis
Certainty of evidence was rated as moderate
Results
There was no significant difference in severe prosthesis-patient mismatch between balloon-expandable valves and self-expandable valves.
OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.27–1.37, P = 0.23 for severe PPM
OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.45–1.38, P = 0.40 for moderate/severe PPM
Both comparisons were non-significant
Random-effects models were used
Results
Mean indexed effective orifice area did not differ significantly between balloon-expandable valves and self-expandable valves.
MD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.11, P = 0.93
This was a secondary hemodynamic outcome
Analysis was based on the pooled data from 14 included studies
Results
Mean transvalvular gradients showed no significant difference between valve types, though self-expandable valves showed a trend toward lower gradients.
MD = -0.91 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.38 to 1.57, P = 0.47
The trend toward lower gradients with SEV did not reach statistical significance
This was a secondary hemodynamic outcome assessed in the meta-analysis
Methods
The systematic review and meta-analysis included 14 studies with 8451 patients undergoing TAVR for small aortic annuli.
4797 patients received balloon-expandable valves and 3654 received self-expandable valves
Studies were identified through a comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and other databases up to July 2025
Data extraction and quality assessment followed Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines
The GRADE approach was used to assess certainty of evidence, rated as moderate across most outcomes
Alam U, Shahid A, Qadri M, Khan H, Rath S, Sriram K, et al.. (2026). Balloon-expandable valve vs. self-expandable valve for small aortic annuli: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and updated meta-analysis.. Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.). https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001851