Baseline prolonged venous transit on CT perfusion predicts the post-treatment Brush Sign after successful reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke patients.
Tsang D, Gad M, et al. • Frontiers in neurology • 2026
Pre-treatment prolonged venous transit independently predicts the post-treatment Brush Sign in AIS-LVO patients despite successful macrovascular reperfusion, linking macroscopic venous congestion to downstream microvascular failure.
Key Findings
Results
Pre-treatment prolonged venous transit (PVT) positivity was significantly more prevalent in patients who developed the post-treatment Brush Sign compared to those who did not.
PVT+ was present in 48.3% of patients who developed the Brush Sign versus 27.2% of those who did not (p = 0.02)
The Brush Sign was observed in 29 of 187 included patients (15.5%)
PVT was defined as Tmax ≥10 seconds in the superior sagittal sinus and/or torcula on baseline CTP
Results
Pre-treatment PVT was an independent predictor of the post-treatment Brush Sign after adjustment for multiple covariates in multivariable logistic regression.
In the adjusted multivariable model (N = 130), PVT+ remained a strong, independent predictor of the Brush Sign (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.32–11.77, p = 0.02)
The model adjusted for age, admission NIHSS, intravenous thrombolysis, final infarct volume, mTICI score, and baseline ASPECTS
All included patients had achieved successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) following mechanical thrombectomy
Results
The association between PVT and the Brush Sign was robust across multiple sensitivity analyses.
The association remained robust across sensitivity analyses accounting for MRI timing, complete reperfusion, occlusion segment, and suspected stroke etiology
The study population consisted of anterior circulation AIS-LVO patients who underwent post-treatment MRI with susceptibility-weighted imaging
Background
The Brush Sign on susceptibility-weighted imaging reflects microvascular venous congestion and the no-reflow phenomenon occurring despite successful macrovascular reperfusion.
The Brush Sign on SWI represents microvascular venous congestion and the 'no-reflow' phenomenon
Successful reperfusion was defined as mTICI 2b-3 on mechanical thrombectomy
The finding links macroscopic venous congestion (PVT) to downstream microvascular failure (Brush Sign)
Conclusions
PVT on CTP is identified as an easily accessible imaging biomarker for anticipating the no-reflow phenotype in AIS-LVO patients.
PVT on CTP indicates impaired macroscopic venous outflow and is measurable on standard pre-treatment perfusion imaging
The study was a retrospective analysis of 187 patients with anterior-circulation AIS-LVO
The authors highlight PVT as 'an easily accessible imaging biomarker for anticipating the no-reflow phenotype'
What This Means
This research suggests that a specific finding visible on standard pre-treatment brain imaging — called prolonged venous transit (PVT), which reflects sluggish blood drainage through large veins — can predict whether a stroke patient will later show signs of microscopic blood vessel failure, even after successful removal of the blood clot. The microscopic failure is detected on follow-up MRI as the 'Brush Sign,' which indicates that tiny blood vessels in the brain remain congested despite the main blockage being cleared. In a study of 187 stroke patients who all had their major artery successfully reopened, those with pre-treatment PVT were nearly four times more likely to develop the Brush Sign afterward.
This matters because successful mechanical thrombectomy — the procedure used to physically remove stroke-causing blood clots — does not always translate into full recovery of blood flow at the microscopic level, a problem known as the 'no-reflow' phenomenon. This study suggests that doctors may be able to identify which patients are at risk for this microscopic failure before treatment even begins, simply by examining the venous drainage patterns on CT perfusion scans that are already routinely performed during stroke workup.
This research suggests that monitoring venous outflow, not just arterial blockage, could be an important part of stroke imaging assessment. Identifying patients likely to experience the no-reflow phenomenon early could potentially open the door to targeted treatments aimed at protecting small blood vessels, though further research would be needed to determine whether such interventions improve patient outcomes.
Tsang D, Gad M, Cho A, Lalwani K, Salim H, Lakhani D, et al.. (2026). Baseline prolonged venous transit on CT perfusion predicts the post-treatment Brush Sign after successful reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke patients.. Frontiers in neurology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1819534