DIY hormone replacement therapy among transgender individuals raises ethical questions that are better addressed through autonomy and harm reduction frameworks than through anxiety-based approaches focused primarily on risks.
Key Findings
Background
Transgender individuals in India face significant barriers to accessing medically supervised hormone replacement therapy, leading some to pursue DIY approaches.
The paper uses the case of Roshni, a researcher at a Hyderabad-based science institution who began identifying as a transgender woman in 2018 and sought medical transition
The case illustrates structural barriers faced by transgender people in accessing formal medical pathways for hormone replacement therapy in India
DIY HRT refers to transgender individuals obtaining and self-administering hormones outside of formal medical supervision
Discussion
The paper argues that autonomy and harm reduction frameworks provide more ethically appropriate responses to DIY HRT than anxiety-based approaches.
The paper critiques 'anxiety' approaches that focus primarily on the risks of DIY HRT without adequately weighing the benefits to transgender individuals
Autonomy-based approaches center the rights of transgender individuals to make informed decisions about their own bodies and medical care
Harm reduction approaches are presented as a practical ethical framework for addressing DIY HRT when formal medical access is unavailable or inaccessible
The paper frames DIY HRT not merely as a medical risk issue but as an issue of gender self-determination and healthcare justice
Discussion
The paper identifies ethical tensions between medical gatekeeping of hormone therapy and the rights of transgender individuals to access gender-affirming care.
Medical gatekeeping structures require transgender individuals to navigate psychiatric and medical evaluations before accessing hormone therapy
These gatekeeping structures can delay or deny access to gender-affirming care, motivating DIY approaches
The paper situates DIY HRT within broader debates about transgender healthcare access and medical authority over transgender bodies
Conclusions
The paper concludes that ethical analysis of DIY HRT should move beyond risk-focused anxiety frameworks toward approaches that respect transgender autonomy and minimize harm.
The paper advocates for harm reduction as a guiding ethical principle for clinicians, policymakers, and researchers engaging with DIY HRT practices
Respecting autonomy is presented as a core ethical obligation when transgender individuals make informed choices about self-administered hormones
The paper calls for healthcare systems to reduce barriers to medically supervised HRT as a means of addressing the conditions that make DIY approaches necessary
Datta S. (2025). Beyond anxiety: Autonomy and harm reduction approaches to DIY Hormone Replacement Therapy.. Indian journal of medical ethics. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2024.065