Bridging the gap: Implementing BRIDGES (Brussels Resilience and Inclusion for Depression - Guidance, Exercise and Support) to shape adolescent outpatient mental health care. A pilot randomized controlled study protocol.
This is a protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial of BRIDGES, a co-designed, theory-informed physiotherapist-led physical activity counselling intervention for physically inactive adolescents with depression, which will assess feasibility, acceptability, implementation processes and preliminary effectiveness to inform a future fully powered hybrid type 2 trial.
Key Findings
Methods
The paper presents a protocol, not trial results: BRIDGES is a pilot RCT using a hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness design.
The design aims to examine feasibility, acceptability, implementation processes and obtain preliminary estimates of clinical effectiveness.
Results are intended to inform a future larger-scale, fully powered hybrid type 2 trial.
The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07422909).
Background
The rationale is that physical activity interventions for adolescents with depression often show limited effectiveness because of insufficient developmental tailoring, limited autonomy support and poor contextual feasibility.
BRIDGES is theory-informed and co-designed.
It integrates the COM-B model, self-determination theory and motivational interviewing to support autonomous and competence-enhancing engagement.
Methods
The planned sample is 60 physically inactive adolescents aged 12-19 years with depression, recruited from an outpatient mental health service in Brussels, Belgium.
Participants will be randomized in waves.
Allocation uses covariate-adaptive minimization with a biased-coin component (p=0.85).
The intervention consists of 18 individualized physiotherapist-led counselling sessions over 12 weeks, with structured support for transitioning to community-based physical activity.
Sessions are individualized and delivered by physiotherapists.
The community transition component addresses contextual feasibility.
Methods
Primary outcomes are feasibility, acceptability and implementation outcomes, guided by the PRISM and RE-AIM frameworks.
Assessed using quantitative measures and semi-structured interviews with adolescents, caregivers and community partners.
Qualitative data will be analysed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven.
Methods
Preliminary effectiveness outcomes are changes in physical activity (PAVS) and depressive symptoms (PHQ-A).
Physical activity is measured with the Physical Activity Vital Sign (PAVS).
Depressive symptoms are measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 modified for Adolescents (PHQ-A).
Analysis uses linear mixed-effects models under an intention-to-treat approach, to estimate cluster-level parameters for a future fully powered trial.
Methods
Secondary outcomes include social support, exercise self-efficacy, cardiorespiratory fitness and waist-to-height ratio.
These are exploratory measures within the pilot trial.
What This Means
This paper describes the plan for a study that has not yet reported results. The study will test BRIDGES, a program designed with input from teenagers and others to help physically inactive adolescents with depression become more active. Earlier exercise programs for depressed teenagers have often worked only modestly, possibly because they did not fit teenagers' developmental needs, did not support their sense of choice, or were hard to fit into real life.
The pilot study plans to enrol 60 adolescents aged 12-19 from an outpatient mental health service in Brussels. Participants will be randomly assigned to the program or a comparison group. The program includes 18 one-on-one counselling sessions with a physiotherapist over 12 weeks, with help moving into physical activity in the community. Researchers will mainly look at whether the program is practical and acceptable, using questionnaires and interviews with teenagers, caregivers and community partners. They will also gather early estimates of changes in physical activity and depressive symptoms.
This research suggests a way of testing whether this kind of program could work in routine mental health care. Because this is a small pilot protocol, it cannot show whether BRIDGES improves depression. Its purpose is to gather the information needed to design a larger, more definitive trial.
Check Your Own Numbers
Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.
Philippot A, Ibanez I, Coppens M, Eeckhout C, Cescutti C, Beine A, et al.. (2026). Bridging the gap: Implementing BRIDGES (Brussels Resilience and Inclusion for Depression - Guidance, Exercise and Support) to shape adolescent outpatient mental health care. A pilot randomized controlled study protocol.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360292