Cardiovascular

Cardiometabolic risk burden and associated behaviours in schoolchildren aged 7-10 years from public urban schools in the Federal District, Brazil.

TL;DR

Within a non-random biochemical subsample of morning-shift schoolchildren aged 7-10 years in the Federal District, Brazil, a high burden of cardiometabolic risk factors was observed, and eating with distractions was associated with greater cardiometabolic risk burden.

Key Findings

Most children in the biochemical subsample had at least one cardiometabolic risk factor.

  • 89.9% of children in the biochemical subsample (n=315) presented at least one cardiometabolic risk factor.
  • The composite cardiometabolic risk outcome was constructed and assessed only in the biochemical subsample.
  • The subsample was non-random and consisted of morning-shift students.

Dyslipidaemia was highly prevalent among children in the biochemical subsample.

  • Dyslipidaemia was present in 72.0% of children in the biochemical subsample.
  • Biochemical markers were assessed in 315 of the 978 children in the study.

Nearly one-third of all schoolchildren in the full sample were overweight.

  • Overweight was observed in 30.2% of the children in the full sample of 978.
  • The sample was drawn from public urban elementary schools in the Federal District, Brazil, with analyses accounting for the complex sampling design.

Eating with distractions was associated with higher odds of having one to two cardiometabolic risk factors.

  • Odds ratio = 2.98; 95% CI: 1.62-5.47.
  • The association was assessed in the biochemical subsample using the composite risk outcome.

Eating with distractions was associated with higher odds of having three or more cardiometabolic risk factors.

  • Odds ratio = 2.52; 95% CI: 1.08-5.90.
  • The wide confidence interval indicates imprecision in the estimate.

Consuming snacks or treats instead of a homemade meal was associated with lower odds of one to two risk factors but not three or more.

  • For one to two risk factors: odds ratio = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.10-0.99.
  • No association was observed with three or more risk factors.
  • The comparison was snacks or treats versus a homemade meal.

The study was a population-based cross-sectional assessment of diet, behaviours, anthropometry, blood pressure and biochemistry in schoolchildren aged 7-10 years.

  • 978 children were included, with a subsample of 315 undergoing biochemical assessment.
  • Data collected included dietary intake, eating and sedentary behaviours, physical activity, anthropometry, blood pressure, and biochemical markers.
  • Analyses accounted for the complex sampling design.

The authors conclude that early preventive strategies targeting modifiable behaviours are needed.

  • This conclusion is based on the high burden of cardiometabolic risk factors and the association with eating with distractions.
  • The findings come from a non-random biochemical subsample of morning-shift students.

What This Means

This study looked at nearly 1,000 children aged 7 to 10 in public urban schools in Brazil's Federal District. It measured their eating habits, physical activity, screen and sitting time, body size, blood pressure, and, in a smaller group of 315 children, blood tests. About 3 in 10 of all children were overweight. In the group with blood tests, about 9 in 10 had at least one cardiometabolic risk factor, and about 7 in 10 had abnormal blood fats (dyslipidaemia). Children who ate while distracted (for example, while watching TV or using a screen) had roughly two and a half to three times higher odds of having one or more risk factors. Eating snacks or treats instead of a homemade meal was linked to lower odds of having one to two risk factors, but not three or more. This was an unexpected result that the authors did not tie to a clear explanation in the abstract. This research suggests that cardiometabolic risk is already common in primary-school children and that everyday eating behaviours may be linked to it. The blood-test group was not randomly chosen and only included morning-shift students, and the study design cannot show cause and effect. The results therefore should not be taken to represent all children, but they support the authors' call for early prevention efforts focused on modifiable behaviours.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Diogo S, Gubert M, Gonçalves V, do Carmo A, Melo G, Oliveira G, et al.. (2026). Cardiometabolic risk burden and associated behaviours in schoolchildren aged 7-10 years from public urban schools in the Federal District, Brazil.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361898