Cardiovascular

Cardiovascular risk associated with first-line Janus kinase inhibitors versus TNF inhibitors in patients with RA: a nationwide cohort study.

TL;DR

First-line use of JAKi was not associated with an increased risk of MACE compared with TNFi in Korean patients with RA, providing real-world evidence supporting the cardiovascular safety of JAKi as first-line advanced therapy.

Key Findings

The study cohort comprised 6174 Korean patients with newly diagnosed RA who started TNFi or JAKi as first-line advanced therapy.

  • 5152 patients were in the TNFi group and 1022 in the JAKi group.
  • Patients were identified from the Korean nationwide claims database as newly diagnosed with RA between 2010 and 2015.
  • Follow-up ran from initiation of TNFi or JAKi through June 2024.

Incidence rates of MACE were similar and low in both treatment groups.

  • The incidence rate was 4.1 per 1000 person-years in the TNFi group.
  • The incidence rate was 3.6 per 1000 person-years in the JAKi group.
  • MACE was defined as myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke or coronary revascularization.

In the total cohort, MACE risk did not differ significantly between JAKi and TNFi.

  • The adjusted HR was 0.636 (95% CI 0.283-1.429) from multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.
  • The confidence interval includes 1 and is wide, reflecting few events.

In the propensity score-matched population, MACE risk also did not differ significantly between JAKi and TNFi.

  • The adjusted HR was 0.715 (95% CI 0.187-2.739).
  • PS-matched analyses were performed to address confounding by indication.
  • The confidence interval is very wide, indicating imprecision.

Findings were consistent across all prespecified subgroups, including patients with baseline cardiovascular risk factors.

  • Subgroups were defined according to baseline cardiovascular risk factors.
  • No subgroup showed a differing result from the overall finding of no significant difference.

The authors conclude that first-line JAKi use was not associated with increased MACE risk compared with TNFi.

  • The findings are described as real-world evidence supporting the cardiovascular safety of JAKi as first-line advanced therapy in RA.

What This Means

This study used Korea's nationwide health insurance claims data to compare heart and stroke risks in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who started one of two types of advanced medication as their first such treatment: TNF inhibitors (an older class of biologic drugs) or JAK inhibitors (newer pills). It followed 6174 patients, of whom 5152 took TNF inhibitors and 1022 took JAK inhibitors, for up to about a decade. The outcome was a major cardiovascular event: heart attack, ischaemic stroke, or a procedure to reopen heart arteries. Major cardiovascular events were uncommon in both groups, at about 4.1 per 1000 person-years with TNF inhibitors and 3.6 per 1000 person-years with JAK inhibitors. After statistical adjustment, and also after matching similar patients, JAK inhibitor users did not have a significantly higher risk than TNF inhibitor users. The results were similar in subgroups, including patients who already had cardiovascular risk factors. This research suggests that, when used as a first advanced therapy, JAK inhibitors did not show more cardiovascular risk than TNF inhibitors in this population. However, there were few events, so the statistical ranges were wide and a modest difference in risk cannot be ruled out. The study is observational and based on claims data, so it cannot prove cause and effect.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Kwon O, Lee H, Jeon S, Park M. (2026). Cardiovascular risk associated with first-line Janus kinase inhibitors versus TNF inhibitors in patients with RA: a nationwide cohort study.. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag582