Enhanced aortic recoil in endurance athletes sustains diastolic cerebral arterial flow volume across a prolonged cardiac cycle, enabling more efficient brain perfusion with fewer cardiac cycles than sedentary controls.
Key Findings
Results
Endurance athletes exhibited higher aortic recoil compared to sedentary controls.
Athletes had aortic recoil of 5.7 cm²·s [4.1, 7.3] versus 4.1 cm²·s [2.6, 5.6] in controls.
Aortic recoil was quantified by temporally integrating ascending aortic cross-sectional area change from CINE phase-contrast MRI.
Study compared 15 young male endurance athletes with 19 age-matched sedentary male controls in resting supine condition.
Results
Endurance athletes had higher stroke volume and lower heart rate than sedentary controls.
Stroke volume was 97 ± 18 mL in athletes versus 82 ± 11 mL in controls.
Heart rate was 53 ± 6 bpm in athletes versus 67 ± 12 bpm in controls.
These findings are consistent with known cardiovascular adaptations to endurance training.
Results
Total cerebral arterial blood and CSF flow volumes and rates across the full cardiac cycle were similar between endurance athletes and sedentary controls.
Despite cardiovascular differences, whole-cycle cerebral blood and CSF flow metrics did not differ significantly between groups.
Flow was measured using CINE phase-contrast MRI at both extra- and intracranial locations.
Flow volume (mL/beat) and rate (mL/min) were quantified for the full cardiac cycle.
Results
Endurance athletes showed significantly greater diastolic arterial cerebral flow volume and lower systolic arterial flow rate compared to controls.
Flow metrics were quantified separately for systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle.
Athletes demonstrated greater diastolic arterial flow volume (mL/beat) despite similar total cycle flow.
Hoshi D, Fukuie M, Tomoto T, Zhu D, Zhang R, Ohyama-Byun K, et al.. (2026). Cerebral Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Dynamics in Endurance Athletes: Associations With Aortic Recoil and Heart Rate.. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70261