Cardiovascular

Clinical outcomes after relapse during rituximab-based maintenance in ANCA-associated vasculitis: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

TL;DR

In patients with AAV who relapsed during rituximab-based maintenance, those who received MMF as part of their initial post-relapse treatment strategy had no second relapses, achieved glucocorticoid discontinuation, and experienced no severe infections, compared to those who did not receive MMF.

Key Findings

All 17 patients with AAV who relapsed during rituximab-based maintenance achieved remission after post-relapse treatment intensification.

  • Study included 17 patients with AAV who experienced their first relapse during RTX-based maintenance after remission induction.
  • Median age was 76 years (IQR, 73–81 years).
  • 16 patients (94.1%) were MPO-ANCA-positive.
  • Median follow-up was 28 months (IQR, 21–33 months).
  • Post-relapse treatment included glucocorticoid escalation and/or RTX re-administration.

No second relapse occurred in the MMF-added group, whereas three patients in the MMF-not-added group experienced a second relapse.

  • MMF-added group: n = 9 patients; MMF-not-added group: n = 8 patients.
  • MMF was initiated at a median of 0.4 months after the first relapse (IQR, 0.3–0.4 months; range, 0.3–0.5 months) in the MMF-added group.
  • Three of eight patients (37.5%) in the MMF-not-added group experienced a second relapse.
  • Zero of nine patients (0%) in the MMF-added group experienced a second relapse.
  • All outcomes were evaluated descriptively due to the small, non-randomized sample.

Glucocorticoids were discontinued in all nine patients in the MMF-added group, whereas all eight patients in the MMF-not-added group continued glucocorticoids while managed without MMF.

  • Glucocorticoid discontinuation rate was 100% (9/9) in the MMF-added group.
  • Glucocorticoid discontinuation rate was 0% (0/8) in the MMF-not-added group.
  • Post-relapse treatment strategies differed with respect to RTX scheduling, concomitant therapies, and physician-directed glucocorticoid tapering between groups.
  • The independent effect of MMF on glucocorticoid discontinuation could not be determined due to non-randomized treatment allocation.

Severe infections requiring hospitalization occurred in none of the patients in the MMF-added group and in three patients in the MMF-not-added group.

  • Zero of nine patients (0%) in the MMF-added group experienced severe infections requiring hospitalization.
  • Three of eight patients (37.5%) in the MMF-not-added group experienced severe infections requiring hospitalization.
  • Because treatment allocation was non-randomized, the independent effect of MMF on infection rates could not be determined.
  • The authors noted these are descriptive and hypothesis-generating findings.

Mycophenolate mofetil has limited evidence supporting its use specifically after relapse during rituximab-based maintenance in AAV.

  • MMF has been investigated as an alternative maintenance therapy in AAV, but evidence regarding its use after relapse during RTX-based maintenance is described as 'limited.'
  • The study was a single-center retrospective cohort study.
  • Non-randomized treatment allocation and differences in concomitant therapies precluded determination of the independent effect of MMF.
  • The authors concluded that findings 'warrant confirmation in future prospective studies.'

What This Means

This research examined what happens to patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), a serious inflammatory disease affecting blood vessels, when they relapse (have a flare-up) while already on a maintenance treatment called rituximab (RTX). Researchers at a single center looked back at 17 patients who experienced a relapse, comparing those whose doctors added a drug called mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to their post-relapse treatment (9 patients) versus those who did not receive MMF (8 patients). The study found that all patients achieved disease remission after treatment was intensified, but there were notable differences between the two groups in terms of subsequent relapses, steroid use, and infections. Among the patients who received MMF as part of their post-relapse treatment, none experienced a second relapse, all were eventually able to stop taking glucocorticoids (steroids), and none required hospitalization for severe infections. In contrast, among patients who did not receive MMF, three experienced a second relapse, all remained on glucocorticoids throughout the follow-up period, and three required hospitalization for severe infections. Most patients in this study (94%) were elderly (median age 76 years) and had a specific antibody type called MPO-ANCA. This research suggests that adding MMF after a relapse during rituximab maintenance may help prevent further relapses, allow steroid tapering, and possibly reduce serious infections in AAV patients. However, because this was a small, non-randomized retrospective study at a single center, and because the treatment groups differed in other ways beyond just MMF use, it is not possible to conclude that MMF alone was responsible for the better outcomes. The authors themselves describe these findings as 'descriptive and hypothesis-generating,' meaning larger, prospective clinical trials are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Yamaguchi M, Sugiyama H, Kinashi H, Kamiya K, Tagami G, Toda M, et al.. (2026). Clinical outcomes after relapse during rituximab-based maintenance in ANCA-associated vasculitis: A single-center retrospective cohort study.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357836