Cardiovascular

Clinical Outcomes of Topical Recombinant Human Epidermal Growth Factor in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study.

TL;DR

About two-thirds of 150 patients with diabetic foot ulcers given topical recombinant human epidermal growth factor (Regen-D 150) had recorded healing without amputation during variable follow-up, but these uncontrolled, descriptive findings do not establish efficacy, superiority or amputation prevention.

Key Findings

The primary outcome of complete healing of the index ulcer without amputation was recorded in 67.3% of patients.

  • The primary outcome occurred in 101/150 patients (67.3%; 95% confidence interval 59.5-74.3).
  • The study was a retrospective, single-centre cohort of 150 consecutive patients receiving Regen-D 150, with no control group.
  • Treatment was added when standard care did not produce adequate granulation.
  • Follow-up was variable.

Sixteen patients underwent amputation, mostly minor.

  • Of 16 amputations, 11 were minor and 5 were major.
  • This corresponds to 16 of 150 patients in the cohort.
  • The authors state the findings do not establish amputation prevention.

A substantial share of patients had ongoing status, died or were lost to follow-up rather than reaching the primary outcome.

  • 27 patients had ongoing status at last follow-up.
  • Ongoing status included open wounds and closed but unconfirmed wounds.
  • Three patients died and three were lost to follow-up.

Median recorded time to healing was 13 weeks.

  • The interquartile range was 10-16 weeks.
  • The time is based on recorded healing, which could not be confirmed in all cases.
  • Follow-up duration varied across patients.

Wound area analyses were exploratory because of unresolved timing inconsistencies in the records.

  • The authors flagged timing inconsistencies in the wound area data that were not resolved.
  • These analyses were therefore not treated as primary or confirmatory.

Healing could not be confirmed for all recorded healings, and the design limits interpretation.

  • The study was retrospective, single-centre, uncontrolled and descriptive.
  • The authors conclude the findings do not establish efficacy, superiority or amputation prevention.
  • Treatment was added selectively when standard care did not produce adequate granulation.

What This Means

This study looked back at the medical records of 150 people with diabetic foot ulcers at one hospital. All received a topical gel containing recombinant human epidermal growth factor (Regen-D 150), which was added to standard care when wounds were not forming healthy new tissue well enough. About two out of three patients (67%) had a recorded complete healing of their ulcer without needing an amputation, and the median time to healing was about 13 weeks. The remaining patients had other outcomes: 16 had amputations (11 minor, 5 major), 27 still had ongoing wounds or unconfirmed closure at last follow-up, three died, and three were lost to follow-up. The authors noted that they could not confirm healing in every case where it was recorded, that follow-up time varied, and that some wound size measurements had timing problems, so those analyses were only exploratory. Because there was no comparison group, this research cannot show whether the treatment caused the healing or whether it works better than standard care alone. It describes what happened to patients treated this way in routine practice, and the authors explicitly state it does not establish efficacy, superiority or the prevention of amputation. Controlled studies would be needed to answer those questions.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Soyer H, Aslan S, Sayar S, Diner G. (2026). Clinical Outcomes of Topical Recombinant Human Epidermal Growth Factor in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study.. International wound journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.71076