Sexual Health

Co-creating gender-transformative interventions for adolescent mental, sexual, and reproductive health and rights: Influence of context and actors on process and content in Niger, Ghana, and Burkina Faso.

TL;DR

While national AMSRHR policies in Niger, Ghana, and Burkina Faso promote gender-sensitive approaches, actual programmes remain largely gender-neutral or gender-blind, and effective co-creation of gender-transformative interventions requires engaging powerful stakeholders, addressing gendered power imbalances, and raising critical consciousness through non-threatening participatory approaches.

Key Findings

National adolescent mental, sexual, and reproductive health and rights (AMSRHR) policies in West Africa promote gender-sensitive approaches, but actual programmes remain largely gender-neutral or gender-blind.

  • The study covered three West African countries: Niger, Ghana, and Burkina Faso.
  • A gap exists between policy rhetoric around gender sensitivity and the gender-neutral or gender-blind nature of implemented programmes.
  • This discrepancy was identified through a situational/context analysis phase and co-creation/data validation workshops.
  • The study design was a multi-country case study with the case defined as 'processes, context, actors and content of co-creation of gender-transformative adolescent mental, sexual, and reproductive health interventions'.

Context and actors significantly influence both the processes and content of co-creating gender-transformative adolescent health interventions in low and middle income countries.

  • Data were drawn from mixed qualitative sources across two research phases: a situational/context analysis and co-creation/data validation workshops.
  • The study was conducted in three distinct West African national contexts — Niger, Ghana, and Burkina Faso — allowing comparison across settings.
  • The multi-country case study design enabled exploration of how differing national contexts shaped co-creation processes and intervention content.
  • Both macro-level factors (national policy environments) and actor-level factors (stakeholder positions and power dynamics) were identified as influential.

Effectively engaging powerful stakeholders with diverse positions is an important consideration in co-creating AMSRHR interventions.

  • Stakeholders held diverse and sometimes conflicting positions on AMSRHR issues.
  • The presence of powerful stakeholders required deliberate strategies for engagement during co-creation processes.
  • This was identified as one of three key considerations for co-creation of effective interventions.
  • The finding emerged from co-creation and data validation workshops conducted across the three countries.

Gendered power imbalances within co-creation processes themselves must be explicitly attended to when developing AMSRHR interventions.

  • Power imbalances related to gender were found to operate not only in the broader health system but also within the co-creation process itself.
  • Failing to address these imbalances could undermine the gender-transformative goals of the interventions being developed.
  • This was identified as a distinct and important consideration separate from stakeholder engagement.
  • The finding draws on participatory data collection methods that allowed observation of group dynamics during workshops.

Raising critical consciousness of complex AMSRHR issues through non-threatening, participatory approaches is essential to the co-creation process.

  • Non-threatening and participatory approaches were found necessary to facilitate open discussion of sensitive AMSRHR topics.
  • Raising critical consciousness was identified as a key mechanism for enabling meaningful engagement with gender-transformative concepts.
  • This approach was particularly important given the complex and potentially contentious nature of gender, mental health, and sexual and reproductive health topics in these contexts.
  • The finding is relevant to co-creation processes in low and middle income country settings more broadly.

The study drew on mixed qualitative data sources across two phases to examine co-creation of gender-transformative adolescent health interventions in West Africa.

  • Phase one involved a situational/context analysis.
  • Phase two involved co-creation and data validation workshops.
  • Data sources were qualitative and mixed in nature, spanning three countries.
  • The case was defined as 'processes, context, actors and content of co-creation of gender-transformative adolescent mental, sexual, and reproductive health interventions'.

What This Means

This research studied how to develop health programs focused on adolescent mental, sexual, and reproductive health in three West African countries — Niger, Ghana, and Burkina Faso — in ways that genuinely address gender inequality. The researchers brought together diverse groups of people including policymakers, health workers, and community members in workshops to collaboratively design (or 'co-create') these programs. They found a striking gap: while official government policies in all three countries talk about being sensitive to gender differences, the actual programs being run on the ground tend to treat everyone the same regardless of gender, or ignore gender issues altogether. The study also identified three key challenges that arose when trying to co-create genuinely gender-transformative programs. First, it was difficult to bring together stakeholders — such as government officials, religious leaders, and community members — who held very different and sometimes opposing views on gender and adolescent health. Second, gender-based power imbalances did not just affect the health issues being discussed; they also showed up within the workshop and design process itself, meaning women and girls could be marginalized even while trying to create programs to help them. Third, because topics like adolescent sexuality and mental health are sensitive or even taboo in many communities, the researchers found that carefully designed, participatory, and non-threatening discussion methods were necessary to get people to engage critically and honestly. This research suggests that developing effective adolescent health programs in low- and middle-income countries requires more than just good policies — it demands careful attention to who is involved in designing programs, how those conversations are structured, and whether gender power dynamics are being actively challenged rather than unconsciously reproduced. The lessons from this multi-country study may be useful for researchers and program designers working on similar issues elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa and beyond.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Wallace L, Darko N, Diarra A, Yaogo M, Gyawu B, Prempeh P, et al.. (2025). Co-creating gender-transformative interventions for adolescent mental, sexual, and reproductive health and rights: Influence of context and actors on process and content in Niger, Ghana, and Burkina Faso.. African journal of reproductive health. https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i6s.2