Cardiovascular

Comparative Effect of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel on Left Ventricular Remodeling in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

TL;DR

Ticagrelor was associated with more favorable LV remodeling parameters compared with clopidogrel in ACS patients post-PCI, including greater reductions in LVEDV, LVESV, and BNP, and greater improvement in LVEF.

Key Findings

Ticagrelor was associated with a greater reduction in LV end-diastolic volume compared with clopidogrel after PCI in ACS patients.

  • Adjusted LVEDV reduction of 8.17 mL with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (95% CI -15.84 to -0.50; P = .039).
  • Analysis was based on multivariable regression models adjusted for confounders.
  • Total cohort included 137 patients: 87 on ticagrelor and 50 on clopidogrel.
  • Echocardiographic data were assessed at baseline and within one-year follow-up.

Ticagrelor was associated with a greater reduction in LV end-systolic volume compared with clopidogrel.

  • Adjusted LVESV reduction of 8.09 mL with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (95% CI -13.88 to -2.29; P = .007).
  • This finding was statistically significant after multivariable adjustment.
  • Patients were required to have been prescribed ticagrelor or clopidogrel for at least 3 months after PCI and to have complete echocardiographic data.

Ticagrelor was associated with a greater improvement in LV ejection fraction compared with clopidogrel.

  • Adjusted LVEF improvement was 4.05% greater with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (95% CI 2.41-5.70; P < .001).
  • This was the most statistically significant of the echocardiographic findings (P < .001).
  • Eligible participants were adults (≥18 years) with confirmed ACS who underwent PCI.

Ticagrelor was associated with a greater reduction in B-type natriuretic peptide compared with clopidogrel.

  • The reduction in BNP was greater with ticagrelor by 73.56 pg/mL (95% CI -144.08 to -3.05; P = .043).
  • BNP was assessed alongside echocardiographic parameters as a marker of cardiac remodeling.
  • Patients who switched between antiplatelets, had contraindications to DAPT, or were noncompliant were excluded from the analysis.

The study population consisted of 137 ACS patients post-PCI who met eligibility criteria for inclusion in the retrospective cohort.

  • 87 patients were on ticagrelor and 50 were on clopidogrel.
  • Inclusion required confirmed ACS, antiplatelet therapy for at least 3 months after PCI, and complete echocardiographic data at baseline and within one-year follow-up.
  • Exclusion criteria included missing follow-up imaging, switching between antiplatelets, contraindications to DAPT, or noncompliance.
  • The study design was a retrospective cohort study.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Tawhari F, Zaitoun M, Elmongui E, Alhuwail A, Najmi A, Alqahtani W, et al.. (2026). Comparative Effect of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel on Left Ventricular Remodeling in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.. Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484261433147