Dietary Supplements

Comparative Effectiveness of Nutritional Strategies for Sarcopenia-Related Outcomes in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

TL;DR

Nutritional supplementation showed overall benefits for ASMI, grip strength, and gait speed in older adults with or at high risk of sarcopenia, while formulation-specific effects varied across outcomes; given the sparse network and low to very low certainty of evidence, these findings should be regarded as candidate signals rather than evidence of a definitive treatment hierarchy.

Key Findings

The review included 20 RCTs with 2160 participants, forming a network of 17 nodes comparing nutritional strategies in older adults with sarcopenia or at high risk of sarcopenia.

  • Databases searched: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI.
  • Analyses used random-effects pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA).
  • Relative rankings were summarized with SUCRA, and certainty of evidence was assessed with CINeMA.

Pooled across all nutritional interventions, supplementation improved appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI), grip strength, and gait speed, but not five-times sit-to-stand (5STS) performance.

  • The abstract states the pooled effect on 5STS 'was not statistically significant'.
  • Conclusions state overall benefits for ASMI, grip strength, and gait speed.

Whey protein + vitamin D + leucine improved ASMI, grip strength, and 5STS completion time in the network meta-analysis.

  • ASMI: SMD = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.52.
  • Grip strength: SMD = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.13 to 1.50.
  • 5STS completion time: SMD = -1.41, 95% CI: -2.63 to -0.18 (reduced time).

Omega-3 fatty acids + leucine + Lactobacillus paracasei PS23 improved ASMI and grip strength, but this node was supported by only a single RCT.

  • ASMI: SMD = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.10 to 1.25.
  • Grip strength: SMD = 1.84, 95% CI: 0.39 to 3.28.

Leucine + vitamin D + medium-chain triglycerides improved gait speed, but this node was also supported by only a single RCT.

  • Gait speed: SMD = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.13 to 2.43.
  • Wide confidence interval reflects imprecision from a single-trial node.

Sensitivity analyses showed that some formulation-specific estimates were not robust.

  • The magnitude and precision of some estimates varied when individual trials were excluded.
  • Estimates also varied when analyses were restricted to participants with confirmed sarcopenia.

The certainty of evidence for the principal comparisons was low to very low, and the network was sparse.

  • Certainty was assessed using CINeMA.
  • The authors conclude that findings are 'candidate signals rather than evidence of a definitive treatment hierarchy'.

Effects of formulations varied across outcomes, with whey protein + vitamin D + leucine showing favorable effects across several outcomes.

  • No single formulation was best across all outcomes.
  • The other two highlighted formulations showed outcome-specific signals based on single-study nodes.

What This Means

This study combined results from 20 randomized trials involving 2160 older adults who had sarcopenia (age-related loss of muscle) or were at high risk of it. It compared different nutritional supplement strategies, such as protein combined with vitamin D and leucine (an amino acid), for effects on muscle mass, grip strength, and physical performance. Overall, nutritional supplements were linked to better muscle mass, grip strength, and walking speed, but not to a clear improvement in the sit-to-stand test. Of the specific formulations, whey protein plus vitamin D plus leucine showed benefits across several measures: muscle mass, grip strength, and sit-to-stand time. Two other combinations (omega-3 plus leucine plus a probiotic, and leucine plus vitamin D plus medium-chain fats) showed promising results for particular outcomes, but each rested on just one trial, so those results are less reliable. The authors stress that the evidence is of low to very low certainty, the network of comparisons was sparse, and results changed in some sensitivity checks. This research suggests that nutritional support may help older adults with sarcopenia, but it does not establish which specific formulation is best; larger, better-designed trials directly comparing formulations are needed.

Check Your Own Numbers

Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.

Upload Your Labs

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Zhang X, Fan S, Zan J, Chen M, Chen X. (2026). Comparative Effectiveness of Nutritional Strategies for Sarcopenia-Related Outcomes in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18203368