Comparison between moderate-load and high-load exercises in the rehabilitation of runners with Achilles tendinopathy: Protocol for a blind randomized controlled trial.
This paper presents a protocol for a blind randomized controlled trial comparing moderate-load (55% 1RM throughout) versus high-load (55% to 90% 1RM progressive) exercise interventions in 60 amateur runners with Achilles tendinopathy, with equal training volume between groups.
Key Findings
Methods
The trial will enroll 60 amateur runners randomly allocated to either a high-load exercise group (HLG) or moderate-load exercise group (MLG).
Participants are amateur runners with Achilles tendinopathy.
Random allocation will be used to assign participants to one of two groups.
The study is designed as a blind randomized controlled trial.
Registration number: RBR-4vwy5xj.
Methods
The high-load exercise group will progressively increase exercise load from 55% to 90% of 1 repetition maximum over 12 weeks.
HLG starts treatment with calf exercises at 55% of 1RM.
Load is progressively increased over 12 weeks to reach 90% 1RM.
The 1RM load will be reassessed every 2 weeks.
Intervention duration is 12 weeks total.
Methods
The moderate-load exercise group will perform calf exercises consistently at 55% of 1RM throughout the entire 12-week intervention.
MLG maintains 55% 1RM load for the full 12 weeks without progression.
The 1RM load will also be reassessed every 2 weeks in this group.
Total training volume (total repetitions and tendon time under tension per week) will be the same in both groups.
This equal-volume design is described as a key distinguishing feature of the trial.
Methods
Both groups will perform additional strengthening exercises for quadriceps and gluteal muscles as part of the intervention.
Quadriceps strengthening exercises are included for both HLG and MLG.
Gluteal muscle strengthening exercises are included for both groups.
This component is in addition to the primary calf exercise protocol.
Methods
The primary outcome measure is symptom severity assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire.
VISA-A will be evaluated at baseline, week 6, week 12 (end of intervention), and 6 months after the intervention.
Pain will be evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at the same time points.
Secondary outcomes include peak isometric strength of ankle, knee, and hip muscles; plantar flexor muscle function; quality of life; and perception of improvement.
Methods
Statistical analysis will be conducted under the intention-to-treat principle using generalized estimating equations (GEE) with Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc tests.
Intention-to-treat principle will be applied to all results.
Generalized estimating equations (GEE) will be the primary analytical method.
Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc tests will be used for multiple comparisons.
Background
This trial is described as the first randomized controlled trial comparing high-load versus moderate-load exercises in individuals with Achilles tendinopathy with equal training volume applied between groups.
The authors state: 'This will be the first randomized controlled trial comparing high-load exercises versus moderate-load exercises in individuals with Achilles tendinopathy applying equal training volume.'
Exercise-based interventions are identified as the main treatment options for Achilles tendinopathy.
The ideal exercise dosage for Achilles tendinopathy is described as currently unknown.
Achilles tendinopathy is described as 'one of the most frequent conditions affecting runners.'
Moreno M, Agergaard A, Costa M, Svensson R, Magnusson S, Scattone Silva R. (2026). Comparison between moderate-load and high-load exercises in the rehabilitation of runners with Achilles tendinopathy: Protocol for a blind randomized controlled trial.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342934