Cardiovascular

[Construction of a prediction model for in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction].

TL;DR

Machine-learning prediction models for in-hospital MACE after emergency PCI in STEMI patients were successfully constructed and internally validated, with the XGBoost model showing good discriminative ability, probability calibration, and clinical net benefit.

Key Findings

In-hospital MACE occurred in 524 of 5829 STEMI patients (about 9.0%) who underwent emergency PCI at a single center between 2015 and 2025.

  • Patients were treated at the Emergency Critical Care Center of Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, from January 1, 2015, to July 1, 2025.
  • The MACE group had 524 cases and the non-MACE group had 5,305 cases.
  • MACE comprised cardiogenic shock, severe heart failure, severe arrhythmia, acute stent thrombosis or recurrent acute MI, non-fatal stroke, and cardiogenic death.
  • The percentage of MACE (about 9.0%) is calculated from the reported counts, not stated in the abstract.

The study cohort was middle-aged and predominantly male.

  • Mean age was (58.1±12.3) years.
  • 4,875 patients (83.63%) were male.

Univariate analysis and Lasso regression selected 14 variables for model construction.

  • Selected variables: B-type natriuretic peptide, myoglobin, left ventricular ejection fraction, HDL cholesterol, high-sensitivity troponin I, triglycerides, triglyceride-glucose index, LDL cholesterol, glycated hemoglobin, creatine kinase-MB, smoking history, heart rate, Killip classification, and age.
  • Candidate variables included demographics, lifestyle factors, past history, admission vital signs, laboratory results within 24 hours of admission, echocardiographic parameters, Killip class, and coronary interventional data.
  • Patients were split 7:3 into a training set (4,080) and a test set (1,749).

Among five machine-learning algorithms, XGBoost had the best predictive performance for in-hospital MACE.

  • The XGBoost model reached an AUC-ROC of 0.992 and an AUPRC of 0.947.
  • Algorithms compared were SVM, logistic regression, random forest, naive Bayes, and XGBoost.
  • The optimal model was chosen on AUC-ROC and AUPRC.

The XGBoost model showed favorable probability calibration and clinical net benefit.

  • Calibration was assessed with calibration curves.
  • Clinical net benefit was assessed with decision curve analysis.
  • The model was internally validated using the test set.

SHAP analysis identified B-type natriuretic peptide, creatine kinase-MB, myoglobin, left ventricular ejection fraction, and triglyceride-glucose index as the five largest contributors to model predictions.

  • The ranking, in descending order of contribution, was BNP, CK-MB, myoglobin, LVEF, and TyG index.
  • SHAP was used to interpret the contribution of each feature.

The authors conclude the XGBoost model may serve as a reference for early in-hospital risk stratification and clinical decision-making in STEMI patients undergoing emergency PCI.

  • The model was described as successfully constructed and internally validated.
  • It was reported to have good discrimination, calibration, and clinical net benefit.

What This Means

This study used records from 5,829 heart attack patients (STEMI) treated with emergency stenting (PCI) at one Beijing hospital over about ten years. About 9% of them had a serious in-hospital complication such as cardiogenic shock, severe heart failure, dangerous heart rhythms, stent clots or repeat heart attack, stroke, or death from heart causes. The researchers tested five computer-learning methods to see whether routine information collected at admission could predict who would have these complications. The best method, called XGBoost, used 14 pieces of information, including blood markers of heart strain and damage (BNP, CK-MB, myoglobin, troponin), heart pumping function (ejection fraction), heart rate, Killip class (a measure of heart failure severity), age, smoking history, and cholesterol and blood sugar measures. It scored very high on the tests used (AUC 0.992), and the factors that mattered most were BNP, CK-MB, myoglobin, ejection fraction, and the triglyceride-glucose index. This research suggests such a model could help doctors identify high-risk patients early after emergency stenting. However, the model was tested only on a held-out portion of data from the same hospital, so its performance elsewhere is unknown. The very high accuracy figures should be confirmed in other hospitals and patient groups before the tool is used widely.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Guo Z, Mi Y, Xin M, He X. (2026). [Construction of a prediction model for in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction].. Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20260825-00532