Cardiovascular

Contemporary Analysis of the Volume-Outcome Relationship for Patients With Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

TL;DR

Joint examination of SAH admission volume and clipping and coiling procedural volume revealed procedural caseload to be the dominant predictor of in-hospital mortality, suggesting that survival benefits historically attributed to admission volume may be more precisely explained by procedural expertise.

Key Findings

Nontraumatic SAH hospitalizations in the 2016-2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database carried a high index mortality of 20.2%.

  • The cohort comprised an estimated 142,271 hospitalizations of adults (≥18 years) with a primary diagnosis of nontraumatic SAH.
  • Data came from the 2016 to 2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database.
  • Index mortality was 20.2%.

Higher SAH admission volume and higher clipping and coiling procedural volume were each independently associated with reduced in-hospital mortality after risk adjustment when modeled separately.

  • Multivariable regression models evaluated the independent associations of SAH admission volume and clipping and coiling procedural volume with in-hospital outcomes.
  • Each volume metric was associated with lower mortality after risk adjustment.

When admission volume and procedural volume were modeled jointly, clipping and coiling procedural volume remained an independent predictor of mortality while SAH admission volume did not.

  • Procedural volume: adjusted odds ratio 0.981 per 10 procedures, P<0.001.
  • SAH admission volume was no longer significant in the joint model (P=0.40).
  • Procedural caseload was the dominant predictor of in-hospital mortality.

The authors interpret the findings as suggesting that survival benefits historically attributed to SAH admission volume may be more precisely explained by procedural expertise.

  • Prior studies showed an inverse association between admission volume and in-hospital mortality, but reported thresholds remain broad.
  • The relative importance of admission versus procedural volume had not previously been evaluated on a national scale.
  • The authors state that the findings support reexamination of volume-based benchmarks in contemporary cerebrovascular care frameworks.

What This Means

This study used a large U.S. national database covering about 142,000 hospital stays for bleeding around the brain from causes other than injury (nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage) between 2016 and 2022. About 1 in 5 patients died during the initial hospital stay. Earlier research found that hospitals treating more of these patients tend to have lower death rates. This study looked at two things at once: how many SAH patients a hospital admits, and how many procedures (surgical clipping or endovascular coiling) it performs to treat the aneurysm. When each was examined alone, higher volume was linked with lower mortality. When both were considered together, only the number of clipping and coiling procedures remained linked to survival. Each additional 10 procedures was associated with slightly lower odds of death (adjusted odds ratio 0.981), while overall admission volume no longer showed a significant link. This research suggests that the survival advantage seen at high-volume hospitals may be better explained by experience with the specific procedures than by the overall number of patients admitted. The authors suggest that standards for designating centers for SAH care may need to be reconsidered with this in mind. This was an observational study, so it shows associations rather than proving cause.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Lai O, Rahmani J, Leung P, Ali K, Ali S, Kim W, et al.. (2026). Contemporary Analysis of the Volume-Outcome Relationship for Patients With Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.. Journal of the American Heart Association. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.126.050933