Cardiovascular

Cox versus log-logistic models for long-term survival in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with and without coronary endarterectomy.

TL;DR

Cox versus log-logistic survival models were compared for long-term survival analysis in patients undergoing OPCAB with and without coronary endarterectomy, addressing model selection challenges in a Middle Eastern cohort with high CE rates.

Key Findings

The study examined survival outcomes after coronary endarterectomy in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in a Middle Eastern cohort.

  • The study population represented an underrepresented Middle Eastern cohort with high CE rates
  • The study compared patients undergoing OPCAB with and without coronary endarterectomy
  • Survival outcomes after CE in OPCAB were described as remaining controversial due to variable complications

The study compared Cox proportional hazards and log-logistic parametric models for analyzing long-term survival in this surgical population.

  • Two competing survival analysis frameworks were evaluated: the Cox (semi-parametric) model and the log-logistic (parametric) model
  • Model selection was identified as challenging in this specific population context
  • The comparison addressed the appropriateness of each model for long-term survival data in CE versus non-CE patients

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Sabzi F, Asadmobini A, Mahaki B, Solouki L. (2026). Cox versus log-logistic models for long-term survival in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with and without coronary endarterectomy.. Folia medica. https://doi.org/10.3897/folmed.68.e168772