Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish DESTEK (D-SCOPE) Questionnaire: A Multidimensional Assessment of Dietitians' Knowledge, Attitudes and Preparedness Regarding Dietary Supplements in Türkiye.
Bilen A, Çalık A, et al. • Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association • 2026
The Turkish adaptation of the D-SCOPE questionnaire (DESTEK) demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability for assessing Turkish dietitians' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived preparedness regarding dietary supplements, with a four-factor structure explaining 38.3% of total variance.
Key Findings
Results
The DESTEK scale achieved acceptable sampling adequacy and significant Bartlett's test results, supporting the suitability of the data for factor analysis.
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy = 0.78
Bartlett's test of sphericity: χ2(153) = 1023.27, p < 0.001
Study included 223 dietitians
Exploratory factor analysis used Principal Axis Factoring with Direct Oblimin rotation
Results
Exploratory factor analysis identified a four-factor structure for the DESTEK questionnaire explaining 38.3% of total variance.
Four factors were extracted from the scale items
The four-factor solution explained 38.3% of total variance
This structure represents a multidimensional assessment of dietitians' supplement-related competencies
The factor structure was derived from a sample of 223 Turkish dietitians
Results
Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated acceptable model fit for the four-factor DESTEK structure.
Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.915
Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.893
Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.062
Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = 0.057
Results
The total DESTEK scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, with subscale reliability values varying across factors.
Total scale Cronbach's alpha = 0.795
Subscale Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.531 to 0.824
Composite reliability values ranged from 0.60 to 0.83
The lowest subscale alpha (0.531) indicates marginal internal consistency for at least one subscale
Results
Test-retest analysis demonstrated acceptable temporal stability of the DESTEK scale.
ICC of 0.772 was described as 'acceptable temporal stability'
Test-retest methodology was used to assess reliability over time
Results
Convergent validity and discriminant validity of the DESTEK scale were supported by psychometric analyses.
Convergent validity was examined through composite reliability and average variance extracted (AVE)
Discriminant validity was evaluated using the Fornell-Larcker criterion
Discriminant validity was reported as supported
Composite reliability values ranged from 0.60 to 0.83 across subscales
Background
The study identified a need for the DESTEK instrument due to the absence of any previously validated Turkish tool for assessing dietitians' supplement-related knowledge and attitudes.
The study notes increasing use of dietary supplements in Türkiye as motivation
No validated Turkish tool was previously available for this purpose
The instrument was culturally adapted from the D-SCOPE (Dietitians' Survey of Comfort, Opinions and Preparedness in Education in Supplements) Questionnaire
The Turkish name DESTEK stands for 'Diyetisyenlerin Eğitim, Supleman Tercihleri ve Konforu Anketi'
Conclusions
The authors recommend further validation of the DESTEK scale in larger and more diverse samples before broader application.
The current findings were described as 'preliminary evidence'
The study sample was limited to 223 dietitians
The authors note the multidimensional structure makes DESTEK 'useful for evaluating specific domains of supplement-related competence'
Further validation in larger and more diverse samples is explicitly recommended
What This Means
This research describes the development and testing of a Turkish-language questionnaire called DESTEK, adapted from an existing English questionnaire (D-SCOPE), designed to measure how much dietitians know about dietary supplements, what their attitudes are, and how prepared they feel to advise patients about supplements. The researchers tested this questionnaire with 223 dietitians in Türkiye and used a series of statistical methods to check whether the questionnaire was reliable and actually measured what it was supposed to measure. They found that the questionnaire has four distinct components (factors), that it is reasonably consistent when taken at different times by the same people, and that the overall statistical tests support its use as a valid measurement tool.
This research suggests that the DESTEK questionnaire could be a useful tool for researchers and healthcare educators in Türkiye who want to assess dietitians' competence in advising patients about dietary supplements, a topic of growing importance given increasing supplement use in the country. Prior to this work, no validated Turkish instrument existed for this purpose. The questionnaire's multidimensional structure means it can distinguish between different aspects of supplement-related knowledge and readiness, rather than producing just a single overall score.
However, the authors note some limitations: the study was based on a relatively small sample, some subscales showed only marginal reliability, and the questionnaire explained less than 40% of the total variation in responses. This research suggests the DESTEK questionnaire shows promise but that additional studies with larger and more varied groups of dietitians are needed before it can be considered fully validated for widespread use.
Check Your Own Numbers
Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.
Bilen A, Çalık A, Demiray P, Kandemir K, Kalkan G, Turan &, et al.. (2026). Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish DESTEK (D-SCOPE) Questionnaire: A Multidimensional Assessment of Dietitians' Knowledge, Attitudes and Preparedness Regarding Dietary Supplements in Türkiye.. Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.70341