Older pedestrians adopted different crossing strategies than younger pedestrians when interacting with automated vehicles, and eHMI decreased crossing initiation time for both age groups but was interpreted and used differently between age groups, with nighttime conditions making pedestrians feel less safe and behave more cautiously.
Key Findings
Results
Older pedestrians adopted a different crossing strategy than younger pedestrians in non-deceleration trials by initiating crossing earlier to compensate for longer crossing duration.
Participants were younger adults (18-35 years old) and older pedestrians (64-77 years old)
In non-deceleration trials where older pedestrians decided to cross, they compensated for their longer crossing duration by initiating their crossing earlier than younger pedestrians
If older pedestrians waited for more prominent deceleration before crossing, they waited longer than younger pedestrians
The study used a cave-based pedestrian lab with virtual reality environments
Results
Nighttime conditions caused pedestrians to feel less safe and behave more cautiously compared to daytime conditions.
Pedestrians reported feeling less safe during nighttime crossings
Pedestrians were less likely to cross during nighttime conditions
Crossing initiation time (CIT) was longer during nighttime when there was no eHMI
Both daytime and nighttime virtual environments were tested in the cave-based pedestrian lab
Results
The eHMI (Slow Pulsing Light Band) decreased crossing initiation time for both younger and older pedestrians.
The eHMI was a Slow Pulsing Light Band design
eHMI decreased CIT for both age groups
Despite the overall reduction in CIT, the eHMI was interpreted and used differently between younger and older pedestrians
eHMI effects were evaluated across both daytime and nighttime conditions
Results
An eHMI failure trial mainly affected younger pedestrians rather than older pedestrians.
A specific eHMI failure trial was included in the experimental design
The eHMI failure condition had differential effects by age group, with younger pedestrians being more affected
Older pedestrians were less affected by the eHMI failure condition than younger pedestrians
This finding suggests age-related differences in reliance on or interpretation of eHMI signals
Methods
AV kinematics including deceleration, speed, and time gaps were investigated as factors influencing pedestrian crossing behavior.
The study manipulated AV kinematics variables: deceleration, speed, and time gaps
Non-deceleration trials were compared to deceleration trials
The prominence of deceleration influenced when older pedestrians decided to initiate crossing
Kinematics and eHMI effects were evaluated across two age groups and two lighting conditions
Background
Much existing AV-pedestrian interaction research has focused on younger pedestrians in daytime conditions, leaving knowledge gaps for older pedestrians and nighttime scenarios.
The authors identified that prior research has focused on younger pedestrians' crossing behavior and experience
Research has predominantly examined daytime conditions with optimum visibility
AVs will interact with pedestrians of all ages and at all times, necessitating broader research
This study addressed these gaps by including both younger (18-35 years) and older (64-77 years) participants and both daytime and nighttime conditions
Lee Y, Madigan R, Wang Y, Garcia J, Qin H, Srinivasan A, et al.. (2026). Crossing in the dark: Investigating the effect of vehicle kinematics and eHMI on older pedestrians' crossing behavior in a virtual reality experiment.. Journal of safety research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2026.01.012