Cardiovascular

Cumulative estimated glucose disposal rate, atherogenic index of plasma, and incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a prospective cohort study.

TL;DR

Cumulative eGDR and cumulative AIP were both associated with incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity after mutual adjustment and provided complementary risk information, with the highest risk in participants with low cumulative eGDR and high cumulative AIP.

Key Findings

Over a median 5.0-year follow-up of 4,215 CHARLS participants, 452 developed incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM).

  • Cohort drawn from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.
  • Cumulative eGDR and cumulative AIP were calculated from repeated measurements at Wave 1 and Wave 3.
  • Participants were followed from Wave 3 to Wave 5 for incident CMM.

Higher cumulative eGDR was independently associated with a lower risk of incident CMM in the mutually adjusted model.

  • Each 1-SD increase in cumulative eGDR: HR 0.57 (95% CI, 0.52-0.63).
  • Analyses used Cox regression with mutual adjustment for cumulative AIP.

Higher cumulative AIP was independently associated with a higher risk of incident CMM in the mutually adjusted model.

  • Each 1-SD increase in cumulative AIP: HR 1.17 (95% CI, 1.06-1.28).
  • The association was weaker in magnitude than that for cumulative eGDR.

Joint analysis showed a graded CMM risk, with the highest risk in participants with low cumulative eGDR and high cumulative AIP.

  • Reference group: high eGDR and low AIP.
  • Fully adjusted HR for high eGDR and high AIP: 1.50 (95% CI, 1.05-2.14).
  • Fully adjusted HR for low eGDR and low AIP: 2.19 (95% CI, 1.58-3.02).
  • Fully adjusted HR for low eGDR and high AIP: 3.83 (95% CI, 2.89-5.06).

A positive additive interaction between cumulative eGDR and cumulative AIP was observed, but the multiplicative interaction was not statistically significant.

  • Interaction analyses were performed on both additive and multiplicative scales.
  • This indicates that the combined effect of low eGDR and high AIP exceeded the sum of the individual effects.

The two indices contributed unequally to prognostic performance: adding eGDR to AIP improved reclassification more than adding AIP to eGDR.

  • Adding cumulative AIP to a model containing cumulative eGDR gave statistically significant but modest reclassification improvements.
  • Adding cumulative eGDR to cumulative AIP produced larger improvements.

The model combining cumulative eGDR and cumulative AIP had better prognostic performance than the corresponding cumulative TyG-AIP model.

  • Improvements were reflected in continuous net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement.

Findings were consistent across subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

  • Restricted cubic splines were also used to examine dose-response associations.
  • The authors report that eGDR and AIP provide complementary risk information.

What This Means

This study followed 4,215 middle-aged and older adults in China for about five years to see who developed cardiometabolic multimorbidity, meaning two or more conditions such as heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The researchers looked at two markers measured at two time points: estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), a measure of insulin sensitivity, and the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), a blood-fat ratio linked to artery-clogging cholesterol patterns. In total, 452 people developed multimorbidity. Higher eGDR (better insulin sensitivity) over time was linked to lower risk, and higher AIP over time was linked to higher risk, with each marker remaining associated after accounting for the other. People with low eGDR and high AIP had the highest risk, about 3.8 times that of people with high eGDR and low AIP. The combination appeared to raise risk more than the two factors would be expected to add up to separately. Of the two markers, eGDR added more predictive information than AIP. This research suggests that insulin resistance and unhealthy blood fats each carry their own information about future risk and that looking at both together may help identify people at higher risk. As an observational study, it cannot show that changing these markers prevents multimorbidity, and the findings are from a Chinese cohort of middle-aged and older adults.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Cai H, Fu Y, Zhu F, Qiu J, Ye H, Xie E. (2026). Cumulative estimated glucose disposal rate, atherogenic index of plasma, and incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a prospective cohort study.. BMC cardiovascular disorders. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-06822-5