Frailty was common and independently associated with worse outcomes after TAVI, and dapagliflozin appeared to confer greater relative benefit in patients with frailty.
Key Findings
Results
Frailty was highly prevalent among patients in the DapaTAVI trial with a baseline frailty assessment.
Among 1222 patients with baseline frailty assessment, 47.2% were frail, 40.3% were prefrail, and 12.4% were robust.
Frailty was assessed with the FRAIL scale (Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, Loss of weight): robust=0, prefrail=1-2, frail=3-5.
This was a post hoc analysis of the DapaTAVI trial of dapagliflozin after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Results
Prefrail and frail patients had a higher risk of the primary composite outcome (all-cause death or worsening heart failure at 1 year) than robust patients.
Over 12 months, 215 patients (17.6%) experienced the primary end point.
Adjusted HR for prefrail vs robust was 1.88 (95% CI, 1.05-3.38).
Adjusted HR for frail vs robust was 2.29 (95% CI, 1.29-4.07); P=0.004.
Results
Dapagliflozin was associated with a lower risk of the primary end point in frail patients but not in prefrail or robust patients.
Frail: HR 0.53 (95% CI, 0.36-0.77).
Prefrail: HR 1.01 (95% CI, 0.66-1.55).
Robust: HR 1.26 (95% CI, 0.42-3.75).
Results
The treatment effect of dapagliflozin differed significantly according to frailty status.
P for interaction=0.021.
The authors conclude dapagliflozin appeared to confer greater relative benefit in patients with frailty.
Results
There was no evidence that frailty modified the safety profile of dapagliflozin.
Safety outcomes were compared across frailty categories with no evidence of effect modification by frailty.
What This Means
This study re-analyzed data from the DapaTAVI trial, which tested the diabetes/heart-failure drug dapagliflozin in people who had undergone transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), a minimally invasive procedure to replace a narrowed heart valve. The researchers asked whether the drug's benefit differed depending on how frail patients were, using a simple five-item frailty questionnaire in 1222 patients.
Almost half of patients (47.2%) were frail and another 40.3% were prefrail. Frail and prefrail patients were more likely to die or be hospitalized/worsen with heart failure within a year than robust patients. Dapagliflozin was linked to a lower risk of these outcomes in frail patients (about a 47% relative reduction), but no clear benefit was seen in prefrail or robust patients. The difference between groups was statistically significant, and the drug's safety did not appear to differ by frailty.
This research suggests that frailty is a common and important marker of risk after TAVI and that dapagliflozin may be especially useful for frail patients. Because this was a post hoc analysis, and the robust group was small, the findings are hypothesis-generating and need confirmation in further studies.
Gonzalez-Manzanares R, Ojeda S, Amat-Santos I, Ariza-Solé A, Romaguera R, López Otero D, et al.. (2026). Dapagliflozin After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation According to Frailty in DapaTAVI Trial.. Journal of the American Heart Association. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.126.051379