Delivering Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Nightmares (CBT-N) in primary care within the Veterans Health Administration: A preliminary report on clinician-perceived barriers and benefits.
Bolstad C, Fung C, et al. • Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine • 2026
PCMHI clinicians perceive greater CBT-N benefits than clinicians in other settings but face significant barriers including scheduling constraints, suggesting that adapting CBT-N for primary care settings could increase uptake and improve access to nightmare treatment within the VHA.
Key Findings
Background
Nightmares are common and often undertreated among veterans and are associated with various biopsychosocial issues.
The paper identifies nightmares as a significant clinical concern in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) population.
The undertreated nature of nightmares motivated efforts to train mental health clinicians in CBT-N delivery within the VHA.
The paper frames nightmare disorder as having broad biopsychosocial associations, suggesting widespread impact.
Results
PCMHI clinicians perceived greater CBT-N benefits compared to clinicians in other settings.
PCMHI clinicians surveyed: n=13; clinicians in other settings surveyed: n=64.
Survey results indicated PCMHI clinicians perceived greater benefits of CBT-N than their counterparts in other practice settings.
This finding was based on program evaluation survey data collected from trained mental health clinicians.
Scheduling constraints were identified as a primary barrier for PCMHI clinicians attempting to deliver CBT-N.
Brief episodes of care characteristic of PCMHI settings were identified as limiting CBT-N feasibility.
The incompatibility between CBT-N's structure and PCMHI's brief-care model was highlighted as a core implementation challenge.
Results
In a subanalysis, PCMHI clinicians rated CBT-N as significantly less appropriate and feasible than clinicians in other settings.
Subanalysis included PCMHI clinicians (n=3) compared to clinicians in other settings (n=12).
PCMHI clinicians found CBT-N to be 'significantly less appropriate and feasible' than non-PCMHI clinicians.
The small sample sizes (n=3 vs. n=12) indicate these are preliminary findings, as noted by the authors.
This subanalysis specifically examined appropriateness and feasibility as distinct implementation outcomes.
Results
Program evaluation data showed overall positive clinician perceptions of CBT-N across settings, while also revealing implementation barriers.
Positive clinician perceptions of CBT-N were documented through program evaluation data.
Implementation barriers were identified beyond scheduling, including incompatibility between CBT-N and certain practice settings.
The evaluation involved clinicians trained by VHA experts in CBT-N delivery.
Total surveyed clinicians across all settings numbered 77 (13 PCMHI + 64 other settings).
Conclusions
The authors conclude that adapting CBT-N for PCMHI settings is supported as a pathway to increased uptake and improved access to nightmare treatment.
The preliminary findings are described as supporting 'adapting CBT-N for PCMHI as a pathway to increased uptake and improved access to nightmare treatment within the VHA.'
The paper frames adaptation as a solution to the structural incompatibility between standard CBT-N and PCMHI's brief-care model.
This recommendation is characterized as preliminary, given the small sample sizes involved.
What This Means
This research examined how clinicians working within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) perceive a therapy called Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Nightmares (CBT-N), with a particular focus on those working in primary care mental health settings (called PCMHI). Nightmares are a common but often untreated problem among veterans, and the VHA has been training clinicians to deliver CBT-N to address this gap. Surveys of 77 trained clinicians found that those in primary care settings actually valued the therapy more than clinicians in other settings — but they also faced more barriers to delivering it, especially around scheduling, because primary care mental health care is typically brief and time-limited, which does not fit well with CBT-N's structure.
A smaller follow-up analysis comparing just 3 PCMHI clinicians to 12 clinicians in other settings found that the primary care clinicians considered CBT-N significantly less appropriate and feasible for their work environment, even while valuing its benefits. This tension — high perceived benefit but low perceived fit — suggests that the therapy as currently designed does not translate easily into primary care mental health settings without modification.
This research suggests that modifying or adapting CBT-N specifically for use in primary care mental health settings could be an important step toward getting more veterans access to nightmare treatment. Because primary care is often where veterans first seek mental health help, making an effective nightmare therapy work in that context could meaningfully expand access. The authors note these are preliminary findings based on small samples, and further research would be needed to confirm and build on them.
Check Your Own Numbers
Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.
Bolstad C, Fung C, Davis L, Zubkoff L, Bramoweth A, Austin A, et al.. (2026). Delivering Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Nightmares (CBT-N) in primary care within the Veterans Health Administration: A preliminary report on clinician-perceived barriers and benefits.. Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44470-026-00073-z