The study found that neither minimal nor hyperphysical activity significantly affects cognitive functions in physical therapy students, and physical activity was not responsible for improvement in cognitive tasks within this population.
Key Findings
Results
Attention performance did not differ significantly between minimally active and hyperactive physical therapy students.
Attention was assessed with the Flanker task on a laptop screen.
One-way ANOVA gave F = 1.75, P = .19.
The sample was 99 participants: 42 minimally active and 57 hyperactive.
Results
Working memory accuracy did not differ significantly between the two activity groups in consistent or varied conditions.
Accuracy in consistent 1 and 2: F = .53, P = .47 and F = 3.57, P = .06.
Accuracy in varied 1 and 2: F = 1.54, P = .22 and F = 1.48, P = .23.
Working memory was assessed with computerized tests of memory automaticity.
Consistent 2 accuracy (P = .06) came closest to significance but did not reach it.
Results
Working memory response times did not differ significantly between minimally active and hyperactive students.
Response time in consistent 1 and 2: F = .001, P = .97 and F = .11, P = .74.
Response time in varied 1 and 2: F = .036, P = .85 and F = 1.80, P = .18.
Differences between groups were tested with one-way ANOVA.
Results
No significant relationship was observed between cognitive function and physical activity.
Pearson correlation tests were used to examine relationships between variables.
Physical activity was measured with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form.
Conclusions
The authors concluded that physical activity level was not responsible for differences in cognitive task performance in this population.
The conclusion applies to physical therapy students aged 20 to 30 at Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam.
The authors note that physical activity may still enhance cognition in early and middle life and protect against age-related decline in older age, and that more research is needed.
Methods
The study used a cross-sectional design with a convenience sample and specific eligibility criteria.
Inclusion: age 20–30, physical therapy student, informed consent, ability to complete computerized cognitive tests.
Exclusion: neurological or psychiatric history, medications affecting cognition, self-reported visual or motor impairments, inability to understand procedures.
Data were analyzed in SPSS version 28.0.1.0.
What This Means
This study compared the attention and working memory of 99 young physical therapy students in Saudi Arabia. Of these, 42 were minimally active and 57 were highly active, based on a standard physical activity questionnaire. Students completed computer-based tests of attention (the Flanker task) and memory automaticity, which looked at both accuracy and response speed.
The researchers found no significant differences between the two groups on any cognitive measure, and no significant relationship between physical activity and cognitive performance. One working memory accuracy measure came close to a difference (P = .06), but it did not reach the usual cutoff for significance.
This research suggests that, among healthy young students in this group, being highly active was not linked to better attention or working memory than being minimally active. The study was cross-sectional with a convenience sample from one university, and all participants were physical therapy students, so the results may not apply to other groups. The authors note that physical activity may still benefit cognition at other life stages, and they call for more research.
Check Your Own Numbers
Upload your bloodwork. We'll cross-reference your results against this study and 4,700 others.
Al Mutairi A, Al-Ramadan M, Abo Qarin M, Al-Abbas M, Al Qahtani N, Al Maghraby M, et al.. (2026). Determining the cognitive function differences between different types of physically active students: Cross-sectional analysis.. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000051091