Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for postoperative venous thromboembolism after neurosurgical intervention in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Li D, Chen J, Weng C, Huang J • Frontiers in neurology • 2026
An interpretable logistic regression model based on seven routinely available variables showed promising performance for postoperative VTE risk stratification in TBI surgery patients and outperformed the Caprini score in internal validation.
Key Findings
Results
Postoperative VTE occurred in 14.1% of TBI patients who underwent neurosurgical intervention in this retrospective cohort.
The cohort enrolled 1,450 TBI patients who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2024.
205 patients (14.1%) developed postoperative VTE.
The study was a retrospective cohort design at a single reported dataset with internal validation only.
Results
Seven predictors were selected by Recursive Feature Elimination for the prediction model.
The predictors were age, Barthel index, ASA classification, multiple surgeries, general anesthesia, limb AIS score, and serum magnesium.
All seven are described as routinely available clinical variables.
Feature selection used Recursive Feature Elimination.
Results
Logistic regression was selected as the final model after comparing six machine learning algorithms, and it showed good discrimination and calibration.
The LR model achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.868 (95% CI: 0.815-0.920).
Calibration was good, with a Brier score of 0.085.
Performance was evaluated using AUC-ROC, calibration, and decision curve analysis.
Results
The model discriminated better than the Caprini score for postoperative VTE in this population.
The Caprini score had an AUC of 0.686.
The difference in AUC was 0.182 in favor of the new model.
The net reclassification improvement (NRI) was 0.559.
Conclusions
The authors provide a nomogram and a web-based calculator to support clinical use of the model.
The model is described as interpretable.
Conventional risk assessment tools were not developed for neurosurgical trauma populations, which limits their applicability.
Validation was internal; the paper describes the performance as promising.
What This Means
This study looked at 1,450 patients who had surgery for traumatic brain injury and asked who is most likely to develop a blood clot in the veins (venous thromboembolism, or VTE) afterward. About 14% of the patients developed one. The researchers built a prediction tool using seven pieces of information that hospitals already collect: age, a daily-living ability score (Barthel index), anesthesia risk class (ASA), whether the patient had more than one surgery, whether general anesthesia was used, a limb injury severity score, and blood magnesium level.
The tool predicted which patients developed clots fairly well (AUC 0.868 in internal testing) and did better than the Caprini score, a commonly used clot-risk tool not designed for this group (AUC 0.686). The authors released a nomogram and an online calculator so clinicians could apply it.
This research suggests that a simple model tailored to brain injury surgery patients could help identify those at higher risk of clots. However, the model was built and tested on data from the same retrospective cohort, so it needs to be tested in other hospitals and prospectively before it can be relied on in routine care.
Li D, Chen J, Weng C, Huang J. (2026). Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model for postoperative venous thromboembolism after neurosurgical intervention in patients with traumatic brain injury.. Frontiers in neurology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1953953