Development and validation of the Physical Capacity Score (PiC) to overcome the lack of correlation among traditional physical tests in detecting age-related decline.
The Physical Capacity Score platform demonstrated good repeatability and revealed that all physical capacities declined with age but captured distinct aspects of physical function, highlighting the necessity of employing a comprehensive battery of tests to gain a holistic understanding of an individual's physical health and detect age-related decline effectively.
Key Findings
Results
The Physical Capacity Score platform demonstrated good repeatability for most variables, with all outcomes showing coefficient of variation below 10% and intraclass correlation coefficient above 0.90, except for CoP path length.
All variables demonstrated COV <10% and ICC >0.90 in test-retest analysis
CoP path length was the exception with COV = 10.5% and ICC = 0.64
The platform uses custom-built hardware and software enabling automated data collection and analysis
Results
Correlations among physical capacity outcomes were weak across all pairwise comparisons.
Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) range was 0.036–0.373 among all outcomes
The weak correlations indicate low redundancy among the six physical tests
Six tests assessed were: finger tapping, handgrip strength, single-leg stance, sit-and-reach, five-times sit-to-stand, and the YMCA 3-minute step test
Results
All physical capacities declined significantly with age, but the magnitude of age-related decline varied considerably across different physical tests.
All age-related differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001)
Handgrip strength showed the smallest age-related effect (η² = 0.035)
Boccia G, Brustio P, Mulasso A, Tufo F, Rainoldi A. (2026). Development and validation of the Physical Capacity Score (PiC) to overcome the lack of correlation among traditional physical tests in detecting age-related decline.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343122