Body Composition

Differential Associations of Visceral Adiposity with Pulmonary Function Impairment by Sex: Identification of a Male-Specific Risk Threshold.

TL;DR

A potential threshold effect at VAI ≈ 103 was observed in males beyond which risk of pulmonary function impairment appeared to increase, while a more linear association was suggested in females, though the VAI × sex interaction term was not statistically significant (P = 0.095).

Key Findings

A potential VAI threshold of approximately 103 was observed in males, beyond which the risk of pulmonary function impairment appeared to increase.

  • The nonlinear association was examined using restricted cubic splines within multivariate logistic regression models, with knots placed at the 5th, 25th, 75th, and 95th centiles.
  • Bootstrap 95% confidence intervals were generated using 500 replicates to assess robustness of the identified threshold.
  • Knot placement sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the identified VAI threshold.
  • The threshold pattern was identified in males specifically, with the VAI value of approximately 103 serving as the identified inflection point.

In females, a more linear association between VAI and pulmonary function impairment was suggested, rather than a threshold pattern.

  • The linear pattern in females suggests that risk of pulmonary function impairment may increase across a wider range of VAI values.
  • This contrasts with the threshold pattern observed in males at VAI ≈ 103.
  • The authors note this pattern suggests 'early and sustained management of visceral adiposity may be important across a wider range of values' in females.

The formal test for sex differences in the association between VAI and pulmonary function impairment was not statistically significant.

  • A formal VAI × sex interaction term was included in a combined model to test for sex differences.
  • The VAI × sex interaction term was not statistically significant (P = 0.095).
  • The authors concluded that 'the evidence for a differential association by sex was inconclusive.'

The study included 6,749 middle-aged and older participants from the 2015 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).

  • The sample comprised 3,374 males and 3,375 females.
  • Pulmonary function was assessed by peak expiratory flow (PEF).
  • Pulmonary function impairment was defined as PEF <80% of the predicted value.
  • The study population was drawn from the 2015 wave of the CHARLS.

Visceral adiposity was assessed using the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI), which was characterized as a core aspect of nutritional status and a modifiable risk factor.

  • VAI was described as 'increasingly recognized as a modifiable risk factor for extra-metabolic diseases.'
  • The study characterized VAI as 'a core aspect of nutritional status.'
  • The authors framed visceral adiposity as relevant to 'healthy aging' through its impact on pulmonary function.
  • The study was described as investigating 'differential associations between the Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI) and impaired pulmonary function in middle-aged and older males and females.'

The authors identified the observed male-specific VAI threshold as a potential reference point for targeted lifestyle or nutritional interventions.

  • The authors stated the VAI threshold of approximately 103 in males 'could provide a useful reference for identifying individuals who might benefit most from targeted lifestyle or nutritional interventions.'
  • The authors emphasized these are 'preliminary findings' that 'require prospective validation before clinical application.'
  • The findings were described as highlighting 'the potential value of considering sex in strategies aimed at reducing visceral adiposity to promote respiratory health.'

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Zhao Y, Ma X, Liu Q, Zhang W, Fan G, Wang R. (2026). Differential Associations of Visceral Adiposity with Pulmonary Function Impairment by Sex: Identification of a Male-Specific Risk Threshold.. Clinical nutrition ESPEN. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2026.102968