Aging & Longevity

DNA Methylation Signatures of Cellular Senescence Are Not Reversed by Senolytic Treatment.

TL;DR

Epigenetic clocks trained on senescence-related CpGs showed no reversal and even acceleration after senolytic treatment, calling into question whether cellular senescence can be captured by DNA methylation and challenging the assumption that aging biomarkers decrease after geroscience interventions.

Key Findings

Senescence, age, and mortality risk intersect at a small subset of the DNA methylome.

  • Only 9,363 CpGs out of 396,333 analyzed (2.4%) were identified at the intersection of senescence, age, and mortality risk.
  • This overlap represents a small proportion of age-related CpGs, which the authors hypothesize explains why existing epigenetic clocks show inconsistent associations with cellular senescence.
  • The analysis was designed to identify a core senescence signal conserved across different cell types and different senescence inducers.

Three epigenetic clocks were generated using the senescence-related CpG subset, trained to predict in vitro senescence, age, and mortality, respectively.

  • The clocks were trained on the 9,363 CpGs at the intersection of senescence, age, and mortality signals.
  • The three predictors were designed to predict: (1) in vitro senescence, (2) chronological age, and (3) mortality risk.
  • These clocks were constructed specifically to better monitor senescence and senolytic treatment compared to traditional epigenetic clocks.

All three senescence-focused epigenetic clocks stayed the same or accelerated after senolytic treatment in both in vivo and in vitro data.

  • None of the three clocks showed reductions following senolytic treatment.
  • This pattern was observed in both in vivo and in vitro experimental settings.
  • The authors describe this result as 'surprising,' as the clocks were designed to focus on senescence-relevant CpGs and were expected to be more sensitive to senolytic interventions than traditional clocks.
  • Prior studies had already found that existing epigenetic clocks show 'no reductions after senolytic treatment,' and this study extended that finding to senescence-specific clocks.

Existing epigenetic clocks show inconsistent associations with cellular senescence.

  • Prior studies found that existing epigenetic clocks show inconsistent associations with cellular senescence and no reductions after senolytic treatment.
  • The authors hypothesize this is because senescence-related CpGs constitute a small proportion of the age-related CpGs used in standard clocks.
  • This inconsistency motivated the development of senescence-focused clocks in the current study.

The findings challenge the assumption that aging biomarkers decrease after geroscience interventions.

  • The authors state the results 'call into question whether cellular senescence can be captured by DNA methylation.'
  • The findings also 'challenge the assumption that aging biomarkers decrease after geroscience interventions.'
  • Epigenetic clocks are described as 'commonly used aging biomarkers based on DNA methylation that predict long-term morbidity and mortality risk,' making this challenge broadly relevant to the field.
  • Increased cellular senescence with age is posited to contribute to age-related disease and mortality, making the inability to capture it with DNA methylation a significant finding.

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Kasamoto J, González J, Markov Y, Sehgal R, Lee E, Dwaraka V, et al.. (2026). DNA Methylation Signatures of Cellular Senescence Are Not Reversed by Senolytic Treatment.. Aging cell. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.70430