Exercise & Training

Does the Intent Match the Output: Aligning Development Goals With Training Load in Youth Basketball.

TL;DR

External training load metrics reflect the structure of coach-assigned development goals, offering a data-driven framework to evaluate alignment between training design and physical demands in youth basketball.

Key Findings

Multinomial logistic regression models classifying development goal category and specific goal type both achieved 66% classification accuracy.

  • Both models achieved 66% classification accuracy with Kappa = 0.60
  • Model for development goal category showed large reduction in AIC (ΔAIC = 1224.1)
  • Model for specific goal type showed large reduction in AIC (ΔAIC = 2540.7)
  • These large AIC reductions demonstrated that coach-assigned IDGs were associated with distinct external load profiles

High-intensity deceleration counts, vertical PlayerLoad, and high-speed running distances were key predictors retained in both classification models.

  • Key predictors were identified following stepwise selection procedures
  • The same predictors (high-intensity deceleration counts, vertical PlayerLoad, and high-speed running distances) were retained in both the development goal category model and the specific goal type model
  • External load data were collected using Catapult Vector S7 devices during all on-court training sessions

Accumulated training time differed significantly across specific goal types across the season.

  • Significant variation in accumulated training time was observed across the 16 specific goal types (e.g., cutting, shooting, load tolerance)
  • This reflects systematic variation in emphasis across the season
  • The 16 specific goal types were grouped under four overarching development goal categories: defensive, offensive, skill, and physical

Individual developmental goals (IDGs) assigned by coaches were retrospectively grouped into four overarching categories and 16 specific goal types using inductive thematic analysis.

  • The four overarching development goal categories were: defensive, offensive, skill, and physical
  • The 16 specific goal types included examples such as cutting, shooting, and load tolerance
  • IDGs were assigned to each player at the start of each term by coaches
  • Inductive thematic analysis was used to retrospectively classify the IDGs

External training load data were collected over two years from 25 elite male youth basketball players in a full-time residential academy.

  • Sample consisted of 25 elite male youth basketball players
  • Data collection spanned two years
  • Players were part of a full-time residential academy setting
  • Per-minute external load metrics were used in the regression models
  • Catapult Vector S7 devices were used to record external load during all on-court training sessions

Have a question about this study?

Citation

Lever J, Duffield R, Murray A, Bill H, Bartlett J, Fullagar H. (2026). Does the Intent Match the Output: Aligning Development Goals With Training Load in Youth Basketball.. European journal of sport science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.70144