Dyadic planning was found to be mainly a complementary strategy to individual planning, such that day-to-day individual planning together with dyadic planning was linked to more physical activity than individual planning alone in persons with pre-obesity and obesity.
Key Findings
Results
On days with no planning, participants reported being less physically active than on days with individual planning only.
Study used an intensive-longitudinal design with 8-day daily diaries.
Sample consisted of 127 persons with pre-obesity or obesity who consulted an outpatient endocrinology clinic.
Multilevel models were used to explain daily self-reported physical activity.
The no-planning condition was compared against the reference category of individual planning only.
No significant planning-PA associations emerged at the between-person level.
Results
Participants were more physically active than usual when they planned both individually and dyadically compared to planning individually only.
Four planning categories were created: no planning; dyadic planning only; both individual and dyadic planning; and individual planning only (reference category).
The combined individual and dyadic planning condition showed greater PA than individual planning alone at the within-person (daily) level.
This finding is described as consistent with 'scant previous research' on dyadic planning as a complementary strategy.
The effect was observed as a same-day predictor in multilevel models.
Results
Dyadic planning only did not emerge as a unique predictor of daily physical activity.
When dyadic planning occurred without individual planning, it did not significantly predict PA compared to individual planning only (the reference category).
This suggests dyadic planning functions as complementary to, rather than a replacement for, individual planning.
The finding applied at the within-person (daily) level of analysis.
No significant between-person level associations were found for any planning category.
Methods
The study examined physical activity planning in persons with pre-obesity or obesity seeking outpatient treatment for intended weight loss.
Participants were recruited from an outpatient endocrinology clinic.
Total sample size was 127 participants.
The study used an 8-day daily diary intensive-longitudinal design.
This was a secondary analysis using multilevel models.
The study was correlational in design.
Conclusions
The authors concluded that including planning partners in physical activity promotion for individuals with pre-obesity and obesity may be promising.
Findings indicate dyadic planning is mainly a complementary strategy to individual planning.
The authors suggest that interpersonal regulatory efforts contribute to the success of individual planning techniques.
The target population was individuals with pre-obesity and obesity intending weight loss.
Individual planning techniques are described as 'frequent intervention components in physical activity promotion.'
Wilhelm L, Knoll N, Luszczynska A, Bar-Kalifa E, Elbelt U, Heuse S. (2026). Dyadic planning as a complementary process to individual planning: Physical activity in daily diaries of persons with pre-obesity or obesity.. British journal of health psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.70061